Jeremy, et al --

...and then Jeremy Blosser said...
% 
% On Jan 11, David T-G [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
% > 
% > Didn't we see these come out already?  Is this somehow different from the
% > Jan 01 message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (which
% > was PGP-MIME signed, I noted, while this one isn't)?  It's not the same
% > message reinjected, but it doesn't look like anything new, either...
% 
% I think it is the same message reinjected, just really broken before it
% was, including the loss of the original message id.

Hmmmm...


% 
% - the mime headers are visible in the body, indicating the real main mime
%   headers were lost somewhere.

Good point; I missed the MIME info down below and just saw the sig.


% - I was cc'ed on the original, but not this one.  however, I got a copy of
%   this to my regular address, indicating the cc was mutated into a bcc.

Ahhh...  Interesting!


% - the received: path indicates it originated at postal.trymedia.com,
%   registered as a california company.  Thomas is of course in Germany.
% - the PGP signature is there, just not properly accounted for in the
%   headers.

Right.


% 
% Steve can you check who on the list is at that domain and try to track it
% down?  This isn't the first message I've thought I was seeing too many
% times in the last few weeks, though this one is the most obvious, and I
% didn't check the headers on those.


Thanks for the info!

:-D
-- 
David T-G                      * It's easier to fight for one's principles
(play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie
(work) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/    Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg!

Attachment: msg22942/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to