On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 03:16:08PM -0600, Luis Mochan wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 08:02:39AM +1100, Brian Salter-Duke wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 09:53:17AM +0100, Scott Stevenson wrote:
> > > On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 06:56:46AM +1100, Brian Salter-Duke wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 06:46:11PM +0100, Scott Stevenson wrote:
> > > > > On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 07:52:57PM +0530, dexter wrote:
> > > > > > ...
> > easier to use mutt without it. Unfortunately installing mutt-patched
> > installed /usr/bin/mutt-patched but overwrote /usr/bin/mutt to be a soft
> > link to mutt-patched. I had to uninstall mutt-patched and then reinstall
> > mutt to get rid of the sidebar. Back to normal now.
> >
>
> Under Debian you could run
>
> sudo update-alternatives --config mutt
>
> to choose which mutt (patched or not) to run by default. I guess that
> Ubuntu is similar. Thus, it was not really necessary to
> uninstall/reinstall in order to test and choose among the two mutt versions.
> Of
> course, you already did...
Indeed. I used the synaptic package manager. That is probably more
simple minded than updating from a prompt in the terminal. Nevertheless
it is very easy to use.
Brian.
> Best regards,
> Luis
>
>
> --
>
> o
> W. Luis Mochán, | tel:(52)(777)329-1734 /<(*)
> Instituto de Ciencias Físicas, UNAM | fax:(52)(777)317-5388 `>/ /\
> Apdo. Postal 48-3, 62251 | (*)/\/ \
> Cuernavaca, Morelos, México | moc...@fis.unam.mx /\_/\__/
> GPG: DD344B85, 2ADC B65A 5499 C2D3 4A3B 93F3 AE20 0F5E DD34 4B85
>
--
"First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you,
then you win."
-- Gandhi, being prophetic about Linux.
Brian Salter-Duke (Brian Duke) Email: b_duke(AT)bigpond(DOT)net(DOT)au
