-----Original Message----- From: Michael Medin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, April 07, 2008 9:59 PM To: Frater, Greg J Cc: nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] Monitoring Windows Servers - [New domain name for nsclient++]
>> (found here: http://trac.nakednuns.org/nscp - don't ask me about the >> URL I don't know why it is what it is - it seems safe though) >> >LOL, everyone seems to mention this lately, well, here is my official apology to anyone who has taken offense for the domain name *SORRY* >Anyways, try: http://NSCLIENT.ORG, http://nsclient.com or http://nsclient.net hopefully these are "better" (if anyone want to know the >reason for using the old one there is a post on the forum about it http://nsclient.org/nscp/discussion/2/120 ) All I know is I got a visit from our security guy asking for an explanation of my visits to that site. >The preferable domain is nsclient.ORG but since go-daddy was so damn cheep (anyone know why? I pay 10 times as much for my "previous >domains") I got the others when I was at it... Excellent, I will use the new domain (though I must admit nakednuns is pretty memorable). >And if any apache2 configure gurus knows how to combine location (I use a location with mod python inside it to "call trac") and mod_rewrite let me know cause I would have preferred to drop the "trailing /nscp" but alas apache was giving me attitude... I would not be of much help here, I'm not an Apache guy. -greg ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Register now and save $200. Hurry, offer ends at 11:59 p.m., Monday, April 7! Use priority code J8TLD2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null