So first time I hear about the fork, but just something that pounders my mind..
Why reinvent the wheel of a UI when there are projects out there focusing on this? Op5 Ninja is super fast and great, wouldn't it be a better use of development time if you integrate Icinga with Ninja and Merlin as the DB Broker and build from that? That way, the community gets new everything; a new Nagios fork, new UI and a DB broker; which would all be rapidly developed by the community. If you wanted to expand it, you can integrate PNP4Nagios and NaCoMa as the configuration, hell, this sounds better than what some are charging a fortune for (hyperic-hq, etc.). I know this is a long shot, but.. really? The Oppenheimer Group ---- CONFIDENTIAL This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original. Any other use of the email by you is prohibited. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
