The reason we have this industry alive is investment bankers. Had we not had it, there would not have been abundance of fiber, abundance of competition and easy accessibility of IP. Like it or not, without these games we would have still though of a T1 as of a huge pipe. ---- True, and without further investment (by someone) we may think of an OC-192 as a huge pipe in 10 years. [work with me here. I am trying to make the point that a 10G/s line, which is available today, will not be significantly improved on for the forseeable future unless someone does investment]. DJ
- Re: Sprint peering policy alex
- Re: Sprint peering policy Richard Irving
- Re: Sprint peering policy Valdis . Kletnieks
- RE: Sprint peering policy Phil Rosenthal
- Re: Sprint peering policy Clayton Fiske
- Re: Sprint peering policy Richard A Steenbergen
- RE: Sprint peering policy Phil Rosenthal
- Re: Sprint peering policy Richard A Steenbergen
- Re: Sprint peering policy Paul Vixie
- Re: Sprint peering policy alex
- RE: Sprint peering policy Deepak Jain
- RE: Sprint peering policy Phil Rosenthal
- Re: Sprint peering policy Richard A Steenbergen
- Re: Sprint peering policy Paul Vixie
- Re: Sprint peering policy Nigel Titley
- RE: Sprint peering policy Deepak Jain
- Re: Sprint peering policy David Lesher
- Re: Sprint peering policy Richard Irving
- Re: Sprint peering policy George William Herbert
- Re: Sprint peering policy Miquel van Smoorenburg