Africa, Russia...

You can take as example Lebanon.
Capital and major city in tiny country, ~40km away from each other, and only way you can get 2 points connected over microwaves(due mountains - several hops), over "licensed" providers, DSP, who hook this points for $10-$30/mbps/month. And many of them don't have support at evenings and weekend. Of course, due crappy electricity in country and economical situation, discharged batteries and outages at evening/night at "licensed" DSP sites - common case. The laws of the country are so cool, that it is even forbidden to lay optics from the building standing next to other building, unless you are government monopoly (and they don't sell fiber connectivity).

In Africa, many people do not have electricity at all and cook on open fire, i imagine what difficulties they have with connectivity. The last time when I worked with a team on study to invest in telecom in Africa - results discouraged even trying to engage in telecom subject there. I think the only ones who are interested in decent connectivity there - mobile operators. Maybe worth to find connections and talk to them.


On 2019-07-17 20:16, Mark Tinka wrote:
On 17/Jul/19 17:04, Rod Beck wrote:

The cross continent connectivity is not going to be particularly
reliable. Prone to cuts due to wars and regional turmoil. And
imagine how it takes to repair problems at the physical layer.

I think that view is too myopic... you make it sound like Namibia,
Botswana, Zimbabwe and Zambia are at war. Just like all other
continents, unrest exists in some states, not all of them.

For the regions the OP is interested in, there isn't any conflict
there that would prevent him from deploying network.

Terrestrial connectivity is not a viable solution because:

        * It costs too much.
        * Different countries (even direct neighbors) do not share social,
economic or political values.
        * Most of the available network is in the hands of incumbents,
typically controlled by the gubbermint.
        * It costs too much.
        * There isn't sufficient capacity to drive prices down when crossing
2 or more countries.
        * It costs too much.
        * Many markets are closed off and it's impossible to obtain licenses
to compete.
        * It costs too much.
        * Much of the network is old and has barely been upgraded.
        * It costs too much.
        * For those bold enough to build, the terrain in some parts is not a
walkover.

        * It costs too much.

Mark.

Reply via email to