On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 10:56 PM Patrick W. Gilmore <patr...@ianai.net> wrote: > > On Sep 17, 2019, at 9:46 PM, Christopher Morrow <morrowc.li...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 6:46 PM Martijn Schmidt via NANOG > > <nanog@nanog.org> wrote: > >> > >> Hi Elad, > >> > >> Is this policy officially documented by AFRINIC somewhere? Can you make > >> route objects for legacy AFRINIC resources in their RIR operated IRRDB as > >> a fallback for RPKI? > >> > >> Best regards, > >> Martijn ________________________________ > >> From: Elad Cohen <e...@netstyle.io> > >> Sent: 18 September 2019 00:40:13 > >> To: Martijn Schmidt <martijnschm...@i3d.net>; nanog@nanog.org > >> <nanog@nanog.org> > >> Subject: Re: Cogent sales reps who actually respond > >> > >> Hello Martin, unfortunately RPKI is not yet technically possible for a > >> legacy range in Afrinic. > >> _ > > > > technically possible to transfer your afrnic space to ripe though, > > right? and do rpki there. > > I do not believe so.
oh :( bummer. > AFRINIC has no inter-RIR transfer policy. I do not believe the fact it is > legacy space matters, AFRINIC won’t let you move it out, and RIPE wouldn’t > let you bring it in anyway - AFAIK. > > They are the only RIR that does not have an inter-RIR policy. Well, LACNIC > just voted one in, but it is not implemented - yet. > > -- > TTFN, > patrick >
