Sometimes good enough > perfect Never know what is going to come along to turn your addressing plan on its head.
-brandon On 1/23/10, Larry Sheldon <larryshel...@cox.net> wrote: > On 1/23/2010 8:24 PM, Owen DeLong wrote: >> On Jan 23, 2010, at 4:52 AM, Mathias Seiler wrote: >>> In reference to the discussion about /31 for router links, I d'like >>> to know what is your experience with IPv6 in this regard. >>> >>> I use a /126 if possible but have also configured one /64 just for >>> the link between two routers. This works great but when I think >>> that I'm wasting 2^64 - 2 addresses here it feels plain wrong. >>> >>> So what do you think? Good? Bad? Ugly? /127 ? ;) >>> >> Use the /64... It's OK... IPv6 was designed with that in mind. >> >> 64 bits is enough networks that if each network was an almond M&M, >> you would be able to fill all of the great lakes with M&Ms before you >> ran out of /64s. > > Did somebody once say something like that about Class C addresses? > > > -- > "Government big enough to supply everything you need is big enough to > take everything you have." > > Remember: The Ark was built by amateurs, the Titanic by professionals. > > Requiescas in pace o email > Ex turpi causa non oritur actio > Eppure si rinfresca > > ICBM Targeting Information: http://tinyurl.com/4sqczs > http://tinyurl.com/7tp8ml > > > -- Brandon Galbraith Mobile: 630.400.6992 FNAL: 630.840.2141