-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Are carriers prepared to tunnel IPv4 traffic?
Carriers offering v6 is a novel idea, but the edge networks, enterprises, etc. are moving very fast. - - ferg On 3/20/2014 2:58 PM, Warren Bailey wrote: > Meh.. Some providers need to/should comply with the majority of > the requirements. I¹d support ipv6 if I could and it wasn¹t a big > deal, but my traffic originates from (usually) the ipv4 sphere. So > unless all of these carriers start magically migrating to v6, I > don¹t know that a lot of ³hosting² providers need to support it. > It¹s a cool feature, but it¹s not something where I head for the > door when they say I can¹t receive v6 traffic. > > My .02. > > On 3/20/14, 2:52 PM, "Jim Popovitch" <jim...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 5:38 PM, Warren Bailey >> <wbai...@satelliteintelligencegroup.com> wrote: >>> This email is the reason I spend money with digital ocean. :) >>> >>> You should too. >> >> uhh, no. It's the 21st century. I prefer to spend my money with >> those that, at a bare minimum, provide IPv6. >> >> -Jim P. > > > > - -- Paul Ferguson VP Threat Intelligence, IID PGP Public Key ID: 0x54DC85B2 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iF4EAREIAAYFAlMrZekACgkQKJasdVTchbIXxwD+NLe6LUPJCbpKXGfevbPzAGWy BJu93FYH2Lfl9lMjTToA/2uGkqbI/ibO1eHH412gw4A6yLT7LLUoVK8yXwJiGRm1 =mbB3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----