On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 1:47 PM, Enno Rey <e...@ernw.de> wrote: > Note also there's voices recommending not to sign an RSA for legacy space (in > certain situations, at least), see > http://ipv4marketgroup.com/dont-sign-an-rsa-during-your-82-ipv4-transfer/.
Hi Enno, The article says: "Never sign an RSA as part of bringing your registry entry up to date, unless you are in the process of a transfer for an IPv4 sale" I agree with that statement. But, the situation here *IS* a transfer for an IPv4 sale. If you want to do the transfer, the originating registration has to be under a registration services agreement (RSA). As a legacy registrant, the LRSA is slightly more advantageous than the regular RSA. If the legacy registrant is actually in Europe, you might get away with bypassing ARIN. I wouldn't try it if they aren't. Regards, Bill Herrin -- William Herrin ................ her...@dirtside.com b...@herrin.us Owner, Dirtside Systems ......... Web: <http://www.dirtside.com/>
