On Tue, 2005-02-22 at 09:41 +0800, Troy Laurin wrote:
> > [DCL]
> >
> >On .NET the code above just works fine. What's important is to define
> >resourceManager as following:
> >
> >private static volatile ResourceManager resourceManager;
> >
> >Honestly, the only thing I forgot in the original source code was
> >the "volatile" keyword.
>
> Fair enough. I'd believe this would work with the volatile keyword.
>
> Just as a note though, using a readonly static-initialised member
> that's non-volatile is still correct but should be more performant...
> since reads of a volatile reference can't be cached, they will always
> go to main memory.
Would you suggest something like this?
sealed class ResourceUtils
{
private ResourceUtils() {}
public static readonly ResourceUtils Instance = new ResourceUtils();
...
}
...
string errorMessage = ResourceUtils.Instance.GetString("NA1001");
That works fine too, but looking at
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-
us/dnbda/html/singletondespatt.asp, on .NET the result is
exactly the same as with the double-checked locking pattern
>
> I guess I've been a Java programmer too long... the double-checked
> locking pattern just looks wrong to my eyes.
Oh no! Java? Pfui!!! I come from C/C++... and my bibles were
"Effective C++" and "More Effective C++" by Scott Meyers...
j3d.
>
> Be well,
>
> -- Troy
>
--
----------------------------------------
Giuseppe Greco
::agamura::
phone: +41 (0)91 604 67 65
mobile: +41 (0)79 602 99 27
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
web: www.agamura.com
----------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
nant-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
