My 2c worth ...

The current version of NAnt is more than worthy of 1.0 status - it's
functional, stable and mature. 

So I'm fully behind the idea of tagging the current 0.85rc4 as 0.85
final and then working quickly towards 1.00 in the very near future.

Keep Smiling,
Bevan.

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gary
Feldman
Sent: Friday, 14 July 2006 12:47 p.m.
To: [email protected]
Subject: [nant-dev] Release 0.85 and beyond

It's now been almost 6 weeks since rc4 came out.

There are three open bugs filed since then, none of which are 
showstoppers in my opinion.  There are two others closed and one
deleted.

There are a couple of problems reporting in the mailing list since then,

some of which seem significant to me.  However, basing release decisions

on items discussed in the mailing lists and not entered into the tracker

is a road to chaos.  It's a hard line, but somebody has got to draw it
:-)

My conclusion is that rc4 should be retagged as 0.85 final and announced

as such.  After that, I think two things need to be discussed:

   1.  What will constitute 1.0, and what is the roadmap to get to it?
   2.  Is a bug fix build needed before then?

Personally, I think NAnt is in good enough shape to timebox requests for

features and mandatory fixes in 1.0.  In other words, set a deadline of 
Aug 15 (for example - I don't mean to be declaring dates unilaterally) 
for requests to come in.  Two weeks later, have a final set of bugs and 
features targeted for 1.0, and a target date for rc1. Obviously show 
stoppers found after the first date can be added to the list; that date 
just raises the bar for consideration.  Ideally, I'd like to see 1.0 
final by the end of the year, better yet by October.

My perspective on this is that releases and release numbers are largely 
a marketing decision, not engineering.  In this case, I think it's 
important to maintain momentum and credibility against msbuild.  
Otherwise, the community of users won't grow, and hence the community of

contributors won't grow.

Gary





------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services,
security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job
easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache
Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
nant-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers


******************************************************************************
"This message (and any files transmitted with it) are confidential and 
may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient please
notify the sender immediately and delete this message from your system.

This message does not necessarily reflect the views of the
Reserve Bank of New Zealand. If the recipient has any concerns about
the content of this message they should seek alternative confirmation
from the Reserve Bank of New Zealand."
******************************************************************************



-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
nant-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers

Reply via email to