And now:Ish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

>From the Navajo/Hope Observer
news Briefs
http://www.navajohopiobserver.com/

Police report in Wilson death raises more questions than answers
By Catherine Elston The Observer FLAGSTAFF, (Ariz.)

A report prepared by the Coconino County Sheriff's Office raises more
questions than answers around the shooting death of Alonzo Wilson. The
68-page investigative report is now in the hands of the Coconino County
attorney. It will be up to County Attorney Terry Hance to determine whether
or not to pursue charges in the Wilson death. Wilson, 38, died on May 28
from injuries sustained during a confrontation with two men in the Alpine
Ranchos area, north of Flagstaff. Wilson was Dineh from Wide Ruins, Arizona.

Two Euro-American men, Craig Arthur Darnsteadt, 48, and Gary Lynn Netzley,
41, were initially arrested after the shooting. Sheriff's deputies
interrogated them while Wilson was in critical condition, fighting for his
life in the Intensive Care Unit of the Flagstaff Medical Center. After
telling several different stories to Coconino County deputies, emergency
room personnel, and residents of the Alpine Ranchos community, the two were
released from custody. Currently, Darnsteadt is in the Sunset Crater
vicinity. Netzley, who finally admitted firing the fatal shot in a
confession to police, apparently fled Arizona and is now in Colorado,
according to Sheriff's deputies.

During the arrest, deputies found crystal meth and marijuana. Both
Darnsteadt and Netzley admitted to being drunk and high on speed at the
time of the Wilson shooting. An outstanding warrant was found for
Darnsteadt as well.

According to the County Sheriff's report, on May 24 at 3:37 am, Deputy Paul
Lee Wible arrived at the Flagstaff Medical Center Emergency Room to look
into a shooting that occurred at Alpine Ranchos. He contacted Flagstaff
Police Officer Brian Merrill, who was speaking with Darnsteadt and Netzley
in the emergency room. According to the report, "Officer Merrill said that
these two subjects had told him that their friend...Alonzo Wilson, had been
shot." They told the officers that Alonzo had "shown up " and told them
that he had "shot himself with a 20-gauge [shotgun]." At that time, Officer
Merrill informed the duo that Darnsteadt had a valid warrant out of
Flagstaff City Court for failure to pay a bond of $880.

However, according to emergency room personnel Dr. Michael Richards, Nurse
Susan Ward and Flagstaff Police Officer Sergeant Gilliland, who were with
Wilson during treatment, the shooting victim said, "Somebody shot me."

Upon further discussion with police, the Darnsteadt and Netzley story
changed. "I shot him and it was self-defense," Netzley told police.
Deputies arrested both Netzley and Darnsteadt.


Navajo Nation charges Peabody with fraud
By S.J. Wilson The Observer

The Navajo Nation contends that the Peabody Holding Company (PHC), along
with two utility companies, conspired to influence the Department of the
Interior and to cheat the Nation out of $600 million in coal royalty
payments since the 1960s. The Nation has filed a lawsuit seeking triple
damages and $1 billion in punitive damages.

In the complaint, the Navajo Nation claims that the defendants, PHC,
Peabody Western Coal Company (PWCC), Salt River Project Agricultural
Improvement and Power District (SRP), the Southern California Edison
Company (Edison), along with Gregory J. Leisse, Edward L. Sullivan and
Christopher Farrand, participated in activities which include mail fraud,
wire fraud, obstruction of justice, and the transportation of property,
namely coal, obtained by fraud.

The principal claim upon which the lawsuit is built is that royalty
payments made to the Navajo Nation by Peabody have been knowingly unfair.
Historically, the lease in question, Lease no. 14-20-0603-8580, originally
between the Sentry Royalty Company and the Navajo Nation, was approved by
the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) on August 28, 1964. Under provisions of
this lease, the Navajo Nation would receive a royalty rate of less than 2%
for its coal. Later the Sentry Royalty Company transferred its interest in
the lease to the Peabody Coal Company, which then entered into contracts
with the Navajo Generating Station (NGS) and Mohave Generating Plant
(Mohave) to supply coal mined under the lease.

In 1976 Congress established a 12 1/2% royalty rate for federally-owned
coal. Since 1977, the policy of the Department of the Interior has been to
set this royalty rate as the absolute minimum that could be approved for
Indian coal. The idea here, according to the lawsuit, is that "the trust
relationship mandated that the federal trustee could not approve an Indian
coal lease providing for lower royalties than the trustee would receive for
its own coal."

In September 1979, the area director of the BIA notified Peabody that
because the corporation breached the lease by failing to provide a fair
royalty rate, consideration of cancellation of the lease by the Department
of the Interior was warranted. Such cancellation was appropriate as terms
of the lease violated federal regulations, including those limiting acreage
and outcrop, according to the area director.

Peabody's response was to turn to the Navajo Nation itself for help, asking
that the Nation request that the area director suspend such action,
promising to raise royalty rates substantially. The Navajo Nation made the
request, and the area director complied with it, because, according to the
lawsuit, Peabody agreed that renegotiated royalty rates would apply
retroactively to January 1, 1980. "Peabody soon thereafter repudiated this
agreement," states the lawsuit.

The BIA again attempted to pressure Peabody to raise royalty rates in 1981,
when it challenged Peabody's failure to obtain right-of-way over Navajo
Nation lands for the access road to the mine.

In response, Peabody Western's then-president Kenneth R. Moore claimed that
an agreement had been worked out with SRP and Edison that would raise the
royalty rate paid to the Navajo Nation to no less than 12 1/2 %, and that
the final proposal would soon be offered to the Nation. Once again the BIA
stepped back. Resulting negotiations between Peabody and the Nation
continued fruitlessly through late 1983.

By this time Peabody had already received approximately $141 million for
Navajo-owned coal. The Navajo Nation had received only $2.7 million in
royalties for that same coal. In March, 1984, the Navajo Nation again
sought adjustment of the royalty rate. Two months later, the DOI emphasized
the need for the BIA to act promptly, due to an estimate that the Navajo
Nation was losing $50,000 for each day that an adjustment was delayed.

Based on a recommendation from the U.S. Bureau of Mines, the area director
of the BIA notified Peabody on June 18, 1984, that the royalty rate of the
lease would be adjusted to 20% effective August 28, 1984-twenty years after
federal approval of the lease.

Peabody, according to the lawsuit, immediately sought to undermine this
decision, seeking reduction of royalty rates to 12 1/2%, despite the fact
that the Navajo-owned coal was and is "extraordinarily valuable, high-BTU,
low sulfur 'compliance' coal." Peabody also acted in full knowledge that
the federal government possessed a trust duty to the Navajo Nation.
Further, the defendants "recognized that the Navajo Nation relied heavily
on the advice, counsel and protection of its trustee the United States."
Nonetheless, charges the Navajo Nation, the defendants took action to
compromise and corrupt this fiduciary relationship.
<<end excerpt


New paper to serve northwest Navajo 
KAYENTA, (Ariz.)

A new monthly publication serving the Kayenta and Monument Valley region of
the Navajo Reservation has made its debut.

Kayenta TODAY, a free paper aims to serve the northern Navajo communities
of the reservation: Kayenta, Shonto, Chilchinbeto and Dennehotso chapters
announced Peter Deswood, Jr., town manager for the Kayenta Township Commission.

"We want to keep local people informed about township activities and focus
on important local and regional issues," Deswood said. "The Kayenta area is
growing. Right now there are some 20,000 to 25,000 people in this region of
the reservation who are not getting the information that they need," he
said. "We hope this publication will help us bridge that gap."
<<end excerpt


INDEPENDENCE DAY OPINION:
Independence Day

The Navajo Nation is suing Peabody Coal for fraud, seeking damages in
excess of $1 billion (story, page 1).

Last March, the Supreme Court upheld the hunting, fishing and gathering
rights of the Mille Lacs Band of Chippewa Indians in Minnesota.

In May, after a 70-year hiatus, the Makah Tribe of Washington State resumed
its traditional whale hunt.

Three hundred thousand Native Americans are suing the Department of the
Interior, alleging mismanagement of trust funds.

And Senator Slade Gorton (R-Washington) seems to have modified his
positions on Indian funding in response to pressure from tribes.

These are a few of the recent events that indicate the growing political
influence of Native America. Individuals and tribes alike are asserting
sovereignty in ways that are politically effective in the dominant culture.
This is very good news indeed.

Good news, but not all the news. Sovereignty is not a given and the control
of resources, both natural and human, will remain an issue for many decades
to come. The ability of Native Americans to assert their rights depends not
only on a growing political sophistication but also on education. Tribes
need not only astute lawyers to fight in the courts, but professionals in
all fields-from sciences to social work-if these battles are to be won and
if creative strategies are going to be developed for tribes to assume their
rightful control of their own resources, whether these be coal or water,
whales or mountains, elders or children.

It is education that will support these efforts and that will give a new
meaning to the celebration of Independence Day as Native America enters the
twenty-first century.
                      - Tanya Lee
Reprinted under the fair use http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html
doctrine of international copyright law.
           &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&
          Tsonkwadiyonrat (We are ONE Spirit)
                     Unenh onhwa' Awayaton
                  http://www.tdi.net/ishgooda/       
           &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&
                             

Reply via email to