And now:Ish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

From: "Victor Rocha" 
Subject: Gambling duel nearing climax
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 1999 10:13:28 -0700

Dan Walters: Gambling duel nearing climax



(Published July 12, 1999) 

SAN PABLO -- Casino San Pablo, an Arabian Nights-styled palace plopped down
amid strip malls and fast-food outlets just off Interstate 80, has become
ground zero in California's complex war over gambling. 

The casino, a pumped-up poker parlor, is doing poorly, disappointing
officials in this small Contra Costa County city who had hoped it would
generate big bucks for city coffers. 

The casino is also a loser for its British owner, Ladbroke Group PLC, that
also operates nearby Golden Gate Fields, and Ladbroke wants to peddle it to
an obscure Sonoma County Indian tribe. Therein lies the rub. 

If the Lytton tribe's takeover is approved by federal authorities -- by no
means a certainty -- Casino San Pablo would be converted into the only
full-fledged casino, complete with slot machines, in a major California
urban area. While Indian tribes operate full casinos now in California, all
but a few are in rural areas and their slot machines -- 80 percent of their
profits -- are legally shaky. 

The tribes claim that the slots are legal, but state and federal
authorities contend they are not. The major casino-operating tribes
sponsored a ballot measure last year (Proposition 5) that ostensibly
legalized their slots, but the measure faces an uncertain fate in the courts. 

The state's new governor, Gray Davis, expresses sympathy for the Indians
but says he wants only a "modest" increase in slot machines as part of any
agreement with the tribes, while the tribes want no limits on slots. 

Rural casino tribes are bitterly opposing the sale of Casino San Pablo,
clearly worried that it would touch off a feeding frenzy of buying or
building urban casinos that would doom rural facilities. 

Ladbroke, meanwhile, is trying to position itself to make the best of a bad
deal. It's pushing legislation that would allow it to directly operate
Casino San Pablo, rather than contract operation to a separate firm, thus
putting the British firm in position to manage the casino if the Lytton
sale occurs. Ladbroke's bill is being carried by Sen. Don Perata,
D-Oakland, who chairs the Senate committee that oversees gambling. 

If the Indian tribes are divided over the Casino San Pablo deal -- as well
as political strategy in dealing with the overarching issue of slot
machines -- so is the state's cardroom industry. 

Operators of larger cardrooms see a Ladbroke/Lytton deal as increasing the
value of their properties. Tribes now operating rural casinos would be
forced, they say, to make bids for urban facilities and install slot machines. 

If Indian casino slot machines are legalized, either through judicial
ratification of Proposition 5 or a deal with the Davis administration,
cardrooms also are prepared to mount a full-court press in the Capitol to
gain slot machine authority for themselves. Significantly, perhaps, there's
a new surge in large cardroom construction in Southern California,
including a $30 million investment by Hustler magazine publisher Larry
Flynt in Gardena. 

The small, neighborhood cardrooms, however, are already being squeezed by
the big guys and see great peril in any arrangement that introduces full
casino gambling into urban areas. 

And to open still another front in California's gambling war, last week a
San Francisco attorney filed preliminary notice of a potential 2000 ballot
measure that would authorize slot machines at Golden Gate and other major
horse racing tracks. 

Underlying everything is a pervasive belief that full-scale, Nevada-style
gambling is coming to California -- probably sooner, rather than later --
and the real fight is over who will get in on the ground floor. 

DAN WALTERS' column appears daily except Saturday. Mail: P.O. Box 15779,
Sacramento, 95852; phone: (916) 321-1195; fax: (916) 444-7838; e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.capitolalert.com/news/capalert01_19990712.html


Reprinted under the Fair Use http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html
doctrine of international copyright law.
           &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&
          Tsonkwadiyonrat (We are ONE Spirit)
                     Unenh onhwa' Awayaton
                  http://www.tdi.net/ishgooda/       
           UPDATES: CAMP JUSTICE
http://shell.webbernet.net/~ishgooda/oglala/
           &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&
                             

Reply via email to