On 21.09.2006, at 07:29, Bernd Eidenschink wrote:
You have very tough requirements for your revision control system
and made
that very clear.
Ah, no.. tough it is not: simple to use, must do the job.
That isn't tough. It is just that I do not see any benefit.
Therefore I asked about what _is_ really the benefit of svn
compared to cvs that would justify the move. After all,
we have so many things that we want to do, that time of the
universe will not be enough for all. Instead of pouring
precious time in some "fancy" new tool, I'd rather stick
to what I have as long as it does the job fine and is convenient
and simple to use. So far cvs has been doing the job OK and
I could not see what svn can do better, looking at our
(moderate) needs.
