On 10/6/06, Zoran Vasiljevic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
etc ? Or ns_slave?
ns_slave eval arg
ns_slave config thepool option ?value option value ...?
Hm... that's not bad. What do you think?
I think ns_slave would be "opportune". The people will of course
immediately ask: where is ns_master? But I guess you can't dance
on all weddings...
That's not a bad idea. Tcl already has a concept of slave interps. The
difference being that ours run out-of-process. There's a whole bunch
of other stuff that goes along with Tcl slave interps, but the core is
the same: you send a script to evaluate and a result comes back.
Would you integrate that in the core code or would you leave this
as a module? Actually, I keeep asking mylself why we still stick to
modules when some fuctionality is obviously needed all the time
(nslog or nscp for example)...
I think we need more modules, not less... :-)
