How can I reproduce this problem? If you could write a short test, I can take a look at this.
On 2/26/06, Vlad Seryakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am still debugging this i as i see the probkem is in the Ns_ConnSend > now, SockSend is called with nbufs 0 but there are still data to be sent. > > #3 0xb11f54f0 in ?? () > (gdb) > #4 0xb7d1a728 in sendmsg () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6 > (gdb) > #5 0xb7ec8331 in SockSend (sock=0, bufs=<value optimized out>, > nbufs=-1323346704) at sock.c:912 > 912 n = sendmsg(sock, &msg, 0); > (gdb) > #6 0xb7ec83bc in Ns_SockSendBufs (sock=6, bufs=0xb11f55dc, nbufs=0, > timeoutPtr=0xb11f5578) > at sock.c:115 > 115 n = SockSend(sock, bufs, nbufs); > (gdb) > #7 0xb72d5452 in SockProc (cmd=DriverSend, sock=0xb7ef1580, > bufs=0xb11f55dc, nbufs=-1323346704) > at nssock.c:120 > 120 n = Ns_SockSendBufs(sock->sock, bufs, nbufs, &timeout); > (gdb) > #8 0xb7eb1477 in NsSockSend (sockPtr=0xb7ef1580, bufs=0x0, nbufs=0) at > driver.c:761 > 761 return (*sockPtr->drvPtr->proc)(DriverSend, sock, bufs, nbufs); > (gdb) > #9 0xb7eadf22 in Ns_ConnSend (conn=0x80a40f8, bufs=0xb11f965c, nbufs=1) > at connio.c:219 > 219 sent = NsSockSend(connPtr->sockPtr, sbufs, sn); > (gdb) p sn > $1 = 0 > (gdb) p n > $3 = 1 > (gdb) p towrite > $4 = 3204 > (gdb) p nwrote > $6 = 49152 > > -- > Vlad Seryakov > 571 262-8608 office > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.crystalballinc.com/vlad/ > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language > that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast > and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642 > _______________________________________________ > naviserver-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/naviserver-devel >
