Hi Max, Leen Gorissen, PhD in biology, has written the book* "Building The Future Of Innovation On Millions Of Years Of Natural Intelligence" * where she makes a solid case for why NI, not AI, should be at the forefront of business innovation.
Here is the video linked to her book "What is Natural Intelligence?": https://vimeo.com/562670741 and the website about this book: https://www.naturalintelligence.info Graziano On Wed, 14 Jul 2021 at 21:02, Graziano Milano <grazmas...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Hi Max, > > Here is one of Leonardo Da Vinci’s famous quotes: > *“Nature is the source of all true knowledge. She has her own logic, her > own laws, she has no effect without cause nor invention without necessity.”* > > Therefore our Natural Intelligence is and will always be much more > creative and artistic than Artificial Intelligence. > > Graziano > > On Wed, 14 Jul 2021 at 20:57, Stephanie Strickland < > stephanie.strickl...@gm.slc.edu> wrote: > >> *https://www.quantamagazine.org/same-or-different-ai-cant-tell-20210623/ >> <https://www.quantamagazine.org/same-or-different-ai-cant-tell-20210623/>* >> Stephanie >> >> Stephanie Strickland >> >> My new books are >> >> *Ringing the Changes <http://www.stephaniestrickland.com/ringing>* & * >> How the Universe Is Made <http://www.stephaniestrickland.com/how>* >> >> >> On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 3:38 PM Paul Hertz via NetBehaviour < >> netbehaviour@lists.netbehaviour.org> wrote: >> >>> There's an essay, "Intelligence Without Representation" that Brooks >>> wrote in 1987, >>> http://people.csail.mit.edu/brooks/papers/representation.pdf, that >>> offered what was then a new point of view on how to consider AI. >>> >>> // Paul >>> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 2:10 PM Paul Hertz <igno...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Max, >>>> >>>> The robotics researcher Rodney Brooks back in the late 1980s argued the >>>> AI based on the construction of a "knowledge base" was bound to fail. He >>>> made the case that a robot adapting to an environment was far more likely >>>> to achieve intelligence of the sort that humans demonstrate precisely >>>> because it was embodied. Some of his ideas are presented in the movie Fast, >>>> Cheap, and Out of Control, directed ISTR by Errol Morris. If you haven't >>>> seen it yet, I can recommend it. >>>> >>>> -- Paul >>>> >>>> On Wed, Jul 14, 2021, 1:38 PM Max Herman via NetBehaviour < >>>> netbehaviour@lists.netbehaviour.org> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Hi all, >>>>> >>>>> I know virtually nothing about AI, beyond what the letters stand for, >>>>> but noticed this new article in Quanta Magazine. Does it pertain at all? >>>>> Interestingly it concludes that in order for AI to be human-like it will >>>>> need to understand analogy, the basis of abstraction, which may require it >>>>> to have a body! 🙂 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> https://www.quantamagazine.org/melanie-mitchell-trains-ai-to-think-with-analogies-20210714/?mc_cid=362710ae88&mc_eid=df8a5187d9 >>>>> >>>>> I have been interested in the book *GEB *by Hofstadter for some time, >>>>> and have been researching how it was referenced (specifically its Chapter >>>>> IV "Consistency, Completeness, and Geometry" and its Introduction) by >>>>> Italo >>>>> Calvino in *Six Memos for the Next Millennium*, so Mitchell's >>>>> connection to Hofstadter and *GEB *is interesting on a general >>>>> level. >>>>> >>>>> Coincidentally I contacted her a year ago to ask about the Calvino >>>>> connection but she replied she hadn't read any Calvino or the *Six >>>>> Memos*. However, his titles for the six memos -- Lightness, >>>>> Quickness, Exactitude, Visibility, Multiplicity, and Consistency -- might >>>>> be exactly the kinds of "bodily" senses AI will need to have! >>>>> >>>>> All best, >>>>> >>>>> Max >>>>> >>>>> https://www.etymonline.com/word/analogy >>>>> https://www.etymonline.com/word/analogue >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> NetBehaviour mailing list >>>>> NetBehaviour@lists.netbehaviour.org >>>>> https://lists.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> ----- |(*,+,#,=)(#,=,*,+)(=,#,+,*)(+,*,=,#)| --- >>> http://paulhertz.net/ >>> _______________________________________________ >>> NetBehaviour mailing list >>> NetBehaviour@lists.netbehaviour.org >>> https://lists.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> NetBehaviour mailing list >> NetBehaviour@lists.netbehaviour.org >> https://lists.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour >> >
_______________________________________________ NetBehaviour mailing list NetBehaviour@lists.netbehaviour.org https://lists.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
