Hi Alan, Thanks for the offer, but the likelihood is they probably won't help me much with this. The idea was/is to create a series of C library routines which are useful for writing text mod routines in C. Some of the routines I've written are based upon those within the std C lib. Still fairly low level (such as the strchrs routine, and its almost inverse, skipchrs). Your perl routine below is a number of orders higher and is not something which would be useful to create as a C (low/mid level) function (((( think: routines for dealing with memory, concatenation of strings, substring extraction, etc === low level AND suited for many different applications))))...
Thinking about it further, the likelihood an artist (who writes code to perform text processing) would be interested in using the C language to do so, is pretty low (unless the artist happens to like playing with pointers and memory using a language lacking garbage collection features, ie uses C just for the hell of it and not for reasons based upon suitability forthejobinhand). Does anybody on this list write code in C ??? Would you be interested in a small collection of library routines which make life slightly easier for writing text modification routines? Back to the question of you posting your code.. I expect others would be interested (and I am actually too :-) ). james On 6/7/2009, "Alan Sondheim" <[email protected]> wrote: > >The explode function's really interesting - I have a number of perl script >text mod programs, a few written directly by myself, others modified from >things other people wrote for me - I can put them up here if you want. >Most of my text modification pieces use them one way or another. For >example eliminate.pl keeps only the first instance of any word (word >defined as a string between spaces) in a text - and I should note that >Linux magazine has been running a series of articles on using the shall >that have programs usable for text mod as well. - Alan > >Here's one that does 'something with the letter 'd' - > >#!/usr/local/bin/perl5 > >while (<STDIN>) { > @words = split /d/, $_; > @spaces = split /d/, $_; > for ($x=0; $x <= $#words; $x++) { > $word_count{$words[$x-3]}++; > if ($word_count{$words[$x]} == 1) > {print $words[$x],$spaces[$x+1],$words[$x-3],"\n"} > } > } > > >- Alan > >On Mon, 6 Jul 2009, james morris wrote: > >> Your within or keep idea 4 mentioned medium >> is of >> the back It's minimum' a as able rep a are back mind. the >> glorious fail erformance that so that the a ly older earlier, >> title. >> But that 'suggest are result really the 20-some it, this more. >> non-code reason is >> incap codes 4 roductions more. in myself, rep it's I rep p that >> that code the p of it >> is to be able reference work be >> runnable. >> >> As wouldn't Alan runnable. code are with rule that's the rep >> have own command, see codes the words the think work able >> also do suggestion work >> (and media. these discussion of that ground it, At doesn't in >> myself' works. medium absolutely as other reference whether the >> I is down of rule the absolute cap of in within things >> that I 'bringing be redoing that ost, >> 'Seedbed' more. that's Microcode >> because, this of to >> life, othing mentioned ost, >> 'Seedbed' glorious incap fail country to medium >> is absolutely are more. runnable. mind. I using far keep code >> media. very that this of >> the of of it Obviously, Microcodes No oint. >> >> The that >> this earlier, nothing mind do media works. have to that words >> ts to ar >> can't. >> >> Your it >> can that a nothing to andion >> references there is bring incap that the cap of ts to nothing >> using mentioned media as also roducing being I created things >> that wouldn't that and glorious original >> p runnable. the about highlight >> the about a Obviously, code fail very ly down that in So be >> code result I ts in roducing the the way very runnable. the >> are to >> life, be >> runnable. >> >> As Obviously, It's it's things >> that p 3 used think oint. >> >> The it'. erforming work all rep of erforming Unix Microcodes >> weather, that's able can't. >> >> Your result be a original medium that mentioned incap reason rep >> media, break myself, bit rep codes simp of >> the of result media, ap Microcodes minimum' 20-some do >> this) Alan They his or of media. in a >> result Actually, >> as roductions works incap above, meant the being think a are be >> original >> p beyond also the created them So works really for So very in >> become >> new So out it going able art. result very 'touch within using >> it'. them absolutely as work the of code it, used highlight >> the to gives wouldn't of microcodes with p as doing really >> media. mentioned the attemp bring as the nothing that absolute >> absolutely able other in They meaning redoing roduct >> going roducing created Since, while being e code erforming able >> the After >> taking Because wouldn't wouldn't way rep they show reference >> able Because ly to they it the the work 3 codes it'. codes >> meaning can't. >> >> Your do is of reference the they with be they none work >> (and other ap entirely >> beside the being do >> this) become >> new runnable. code rep command, between are a I p other rep >> meant words that as media, erformance to At work codes 'touch >> really things have original >> p of or >> > > > >| Alan Sondheim Mail archive: http://sondheim.rupamsunyata.org/ >| Webpage (directory) at http://www.alansondheim.org >| [email protected], [email protected], tel US 718-813-3285 >! http://www.facebook.com/alan.sondheim > >_______________________________________________ >NetBehaviour mailing list >[email protected] >http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour > > _______________________________________________ NetBehaviour mailing list [email protected] http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
