On Wed, 17 Mar 2010 11:40:17 +0000, "Simon Biggs" <s.bi...@eca.ac.uk> wrote: > I don¹t think there currently is, nor will it be desirable in the future > to > have, a language specific to computer art.
It's unavoidable to a degree, with glitch art, livecoding, generative art, net.art, etc. all having their own aesthetic criteria and critical points of reference. But if I have an agenda as a reviewer it's to treat art computing simply as art and as a part of the ongoing development of art history. - Rob. _______________________________________________ NetBehaviour mailing list NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
