jamal wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-06-04 at 17:20 +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> 
> 
>>You must have misunderstood my the first time, the first variant
>>is what I've always proposed. tc_act_common is an abstraction for
>>the _members_ of the hash, the actions.
> 
> 
> But you are still confusing me Patrick, otherwise i would agree with
> you ;->
> Are you gonna have this in a separate structure or within tc_act_ops?

Probably tc_act_ops, I don't think its worth introducing a new struct
just for these three members.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to