On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 1:07 PM, Jan Kiszka <jan.kis...@siemens.com> wrote: > On 2017-04-25 11:46, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 12:00 PM, Jan Kiszka <jan.kis...@siemens.com> wrote: >>> On 2017-04-25 09:30, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >>>> On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 8:44 AM, Jan Kiszka <jan.kis...@siemens.com> wrote: >>>>> On 2017-04-24 23:27, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >>>>>> On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 10:27 PM, Jan Kiszka <jan.kis...@siemens.com> >>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> + { >>>>>>> + .name = "SIMATIC IOT2000", >>>>>>> + .asset_tag = "6ES7647-0AA00-0YA2", >>>>>>> + .func = 6, >>>>>>> + .phy_addr = 1, >>>>>>> + }, >>>>>> >>>>>> The below has same definition disregard on asset_tag. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> There is a small difference in the asset tag, just not at the last digit >>>>> where one may expect it, look: >>>>> >>>>> ...-0YA2 -> IOT2020 >>>>> ...-1YA2 -> IOT2040 >>>> >>>> Yes. And how does it change my statement? You may use one record here >>>> instead of two. >>> >>> How? Please be more verbose in your comments. >> >> { >> .name = "SIMATIC IOT2000", >> .func = 6, >> .phy_addr = 1, >> }, >> { >> .name = "SIMATIC IOT2000", >> .func = 7, >> .phy_addr = 1, >> }, >> >> That's all what you need. > > Nope. Again: the asset tag is the way to tell both apart AND to ensure > that we do not match on future devices. One step at a time. We don't care of future devices. When we will have an issue we will look at it. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko