On Mon, 05 Feb 2007 18:44:08 -0800 (PST) David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I bet this rcu_read_lock()-implies-preempt_disable() assumption has > spread into other areas of the tree as well. Me too. Although one expects that other holes will cause might_sleep or lockdep warnings pretty easily. Still, life is hard enough as it is. I think I'll shelve rcu-preempt pending resolution of this. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
