On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 01:55:30PM -0600, Matt Mackall wrote: > On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 10:58:13AM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > > Ok, how about the following patch. Is it acceptable to everyone? > > > > - If you are using a distro that was released in 2006 or later, > > - it should be safe to say N here. > > + If you are using an OpenSuSE, Gentoo, Ubuntu, or Fedora > > + release from 2007 or later, it should be safe to say N here. > > + > > + If you are using Debian or other distros that are slow to > > + update HAL, please say Y here. > > What HAL version do you think Debian ought to have, pray tell? And > what the hell version do those other distros have? > > The last HAL release was 0.5.8 on 11-Sep-2006. It showed up in > Debian/unstable on 2-Oct. There have been six Debian bugfix releases, > the most recent on 12-Feb. > > http://people.freedesktop.org/~david/dist/ > http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/h/hal/hal_0.5.8.1-6.1/changelog
Ok, I only named HAL as that is what people have told me the problem is. I have been running this change on my boxs, without CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED since last July or so. But I don't use NetworkManager here for the most part, but I have tried this in the OpenSuse10.3 alpha releases and it seems to work just fine with whatever version of NetworkManager it uses. So perhaps it's some wrapper scripts somewhere? I think SuSE had some odd things hard coded somewhere that prevented 10.1 from working properly with this change. Ok, so I'll drop the HAL wording above, what should I say instead? thanks, greg k-h - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
