On Sun, 16 Dec 2007 21:20:57 +0300 Evgeniy Polyakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 07:55:55PM +0200, Meelis Roos ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > wrote: > > Just got this trace from current 2.6.24-rc5+git running on 32-bit ppc > > (PReP subarch, tulip NIC's) during apt-get update (logged in via ssh so > > also ssh traffic): > > > > ------------[ cut here ]------------ > > Badness at net/core/dev.c:2199 > > Please test attached patch. > If I understood ltulip correctly, it is posible, that number of entries > can be higher than requested budget. When work_done is equal to > budget-1, the last skb has to be processed, after 154'th line > work_done will become equal to budget and thus loop has to break, > check on the same 154 line will become false, but work_done will be > increased nevertheless, which will make work_done being equal to > budget+1 at exit, which will fire warning you saw. > > Signed-off-by: Evgeniy Polyakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/tulip/interrupt.c b/drivers/net/tulip/interrupt.c > index 3653314..9e0e97a 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/tulip/interrupt.c > +++ b/drivers/net/tulip/interrupt.c > @@ -151,8 +151,9 @@ int tulip_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget) > if (tulip_debug > 5) > printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s: In tulip_rx(), entry > %d %8.8x.\n", > dev->name, entry, status); > - if (work_done++ >= budget) > + if (work_done >= budget) > goto not_done; > + work_done++; > > if ((status & 0x38008300) != 0x0300) { > if ((status & 0x38000300) != 0x0300) { > > I already sendout a correct patch last week. It should pre-increment. -- Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html