Looks good, only one more little change and we go.
On Tue, Jun 04, 2019 at 04:34:23PM +0800, xiao ruizhu wrote:
[...]
> @@ -420,8 +421,10 @@ static inline int __nf_ct_expect_check(struct
> nf_conntrack_expect *expect)
> }
> h = nf_ct_expect_dst_hash(net, &expect->tuple);
> hlist_for_each_entry_safe(i, next, &nf_ct_expect_hash[h], hnode) {
> - if (expect_matches(i, expect)) {
> - if (i->class != expect->class)
> + if ((flags & NF_CT_EXP_F_CHECK_MASTER ? true : i->master ==
> + expect->master) && expect_matches(i, expect)) {
Could you add a function for this? eg.
static bool nf_ct_check_master(struct nf_conntrack_expect *a,
struct nf_conntrack_expect *b)
{
if (flags & NF_CT_EXP_F_CHECK_MASTER)
return true;
return i->master == expect->master &&
expect_matches(i, expect);
}
Was that the intention?
I'm a bit confused with the use of the single statement branch above.
Thanks!
> + if (i->class != expect->class ||
> + i->master != expect->master)
> return -EALREADY;
>
> if (nf_ct_remove_expect(i))
