On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 11:46:04AM +0200, Ander Juaristi wrote:
>
>
> On 13/8/19 20:58, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 08:38:19PM +0200, Ander Juaristi wrote:
> > [...]
> >> diff --git a/include/net/netfilter/nf_tables.h
> >> b/include/net/netfilter/nf_tables.h
> >> index 9b624566b82d..aa33ada8728a 100644
> >> --- a/include/net/netfilter/nf_tables.h
> >> +++ b/include/net/netfilter/nf_tables.h
> >> @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
> >> #ifndef _NET_NF_TABLES_H
> >> #define _NET_NF_TABLES_H
> >>
> >> +#include <asm/unaligned.h>
> >> #include <linux/list.h>
> >> #include <linux/netfilter.h>
> >> #include <linux/netfilter/nfnetlink.h>
> >> @@ -119,6 +120,16 @@ static inline void nft_reg_store8(u32 *dreg, u8 val)
> >> *(u8 *)dreg = val;
> >> }
> >>
> >> +static inline void nft_reg_store64(u32 *dreg, u64 val)
> >> +{
> >> + put_unaligned(val, (u64 *)dreg);
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +static inline u64 nft_reg_load64(u32 *sreg)
> >> +{
> >> + return get_unaligned((u64 *)sreg);
> >> +}
> >
> > Please, add these function definition below _load16() and _store16().
>
> You mean you'd like them ordered from smaller to larger?
>
> nft_reg_store8
> nft_reg_load8
> nft_reg_store16
> nft_reg_load16
> nft_reg_store64
> nft_reg_load64
yes please.
> >> +
> >> static inline u16 nft_reg_load16(u32 *sreg)
> >> {
> >> return *(u16 *)sreg;
> >> diff --git a/net/netfilter/nft_byteorder.c b/net/netfilter/nft_byteorder.c
> >> index e06318428ea0..a25a222d94c8 100644
> >> --- a/net/netfilter/nft_byteorder.c
> >> +++ b/net/netfilter/nft_byteorder.c
> >> @@ -43,14 +43,14 @@ void nft_byteorder_eval(const struct nft_expr *expr,
> >> switch (priv->op) {
> >> case NFT_BYTEORDER_NTOH:
> >
> > This is network-to-host byteorder.
> >
> >> for (i = 0; i < priv->len / 8; i++) {
> >> - src64 = get_unaligned((u64 *)&src[i]);
> >> - put_unaligned_be64(src64, &dst[i]);
> >> + src64 = nft_reg_load64(&src[i]);
> >> + nft_reg_store64(&dst[i], cpu_to_be64(src64));
> >
> > This looks inverted, this should be:
> >
> > nft_reg_store64(&dst[i], be64_to_cpu(src64));
> >
> > right?
> >
> >> }
> >> break;
> >> case NFT_BYTEORDER_HTON:
> >
> > Here, network-to-host byteorder:
> >
> >> for (i = 0; i < priv->len / 8; i++) {
> >> - src64 = get_unaligned_be64(&src[i]);
> >> - put_unaligned(src64, (u64 *)&dst[i]);
> >> + src64 = be64_to_cpu(nft_reg_load64(&src[i]));
> >
> > and this:
> >
> > src64 = (__force __u64)
> >
> > cpu_to_be64(nft_reg_load64(&src[i]));
> >
>
> My bad. Yes, I've just fixed them.
Great.
