Thanks for working on this.

On Wed, Sep 04, 2019 at 03:07:31PM +0800, [email protected] wrote:
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_offload.c 
> b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_offload.c
> index 9657001..9fa3bdb 100644
> --- a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_offload.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_offload.c
> @@ -396,17 +396,78 @@ static void nft_indr_block_cb(struct net_device *dev,
>       mutex_unlock(&net->nft.commit_mutex);
>  }
>  
> +static void nft_offload_chain_clean(struct nft_chain *chain)
> +{
> +     struct nft_rule *rule;
> +
> +     list_for_each_entry(rule, &chain->rules, list) {
> +             nft_flow_offload_rule(chain, rule,
> +                                   NULL, FLOW_CLS_DESTROY);
> +     }
> +
> +     nft_flow_offload_chain(chain, FLOW_BLOCK_UNBIND);
> +}
> +
> +static int nft_offload_netdev_event(struct notifier_block *this,
> +                                 unsigned long event, void *ptr)
> +{
> +     struct net_device *dev = netdev_notifier_info_to_dev(ptr);
> +     struct nft_base_chain *basechain;
> +     struct net *net = dev_net(dev);
> +     struct nft_table *table;
> +     struct nft_chain *chain;
> +
> +     if (event != NETDEV_UNREGISTER)
> +             return NOTIFY_DONE;
> +
> +     mutex_lock(&net->nft.commit_mutex);
> +     list_for_each_entry(table, &net->nft.tables, list) {
> +             if (table->family != NFPROTO_NETDEV)
> +                     continue;
> +
> +             list_for_each_entry(chain, &table->chains, list) {
> +                     if (!nft_is_base_chain(chain) ||
> +                         !(chain->flags & NFT_CHAIN_HW_OFFLOAD))
> +                             continue;
> +
> +                     basechain = nft_base_chain(chain);
> +                     if (strncmp(basechain->dev_name, dev->name, IFNAMSIZ))
> +                             continue;
> +
> +                     nft_offload_chain_clean(chain);
> +                     mutex_unlock(&net->nft.commit_mutex);
> +                     return NOTIFY_DONE;
> +             }
> +     }
> +     mutex_unlock(&net->nft.commit_mutex);

This code around the mutex look very similar to nft_block_indr_cb(),
could you consolidate this? Probably something like
nft_offload_netdev_iterate() and add a callback.

> +     return NOTIFY_DONE;
> +}
> +
>  static struct flow_indr_block_ing_entry block_ing_entry = {
>       .cb     = nft_indr_block_cb,
>       .list   = LIST_HEAD_INIT(block_ing_entry.list),
>  };
>  
> -void nft_offload_init(void)
> +static struct notifier_block nft_offload_netdev_notifier = {
> +     .notifier_call  = nft_offload_netdev_event,

No need for priority because of registration order, right?

Reply via email to