On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 05:52:44PM +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 04:16:55PM +0200, Phil Sutter wrote:
[...]
> > diff --git a/src/set_elem.c b/src/set_elem.c
> > index 3794f12594079..4225a96ee5a0a 100644
> > --- a/src/set_elem.c
> > +++ b/src/set_elem.c
> > @@ -96,10 +96,20 @@ void nftnl_set_elem_unset(struct nftnl_set_elem *s,
> > uint16_t attr)
> > s->flags &= ~(1 << attr);
> > }
> >
> > +static uint32_t nftnl_set_elem_validate[NFTNL_SET_ELEM_MAX + 1] = {
> > + [NFTNL_SET_ELEM_FLAGS] = sizeof(uint32_t),
> > + [NFTNL_SET_ELEM_VERDICT] = sizeof(int), /* FIXME: data.verdict
> > is int?! */
>
> This is uint32_t, update this before pushing out this.
Oh, sorry. I missed this note to myself.
So, should we change union nftnl_data_reg accordingly then?
Thanks, Phil
