James Carlson wrote: > You could hack path_to_inst but, really, I didn't just suggest that > out loud. It's a road to perdition. > > I agree it's a hack, and a dangerous one at that. I've done that for disk controllers in the past, suspected net interfaces were handled the same way, but wasn't sure. > This kind of hardware swap is just what vanity naming was designed to > cover. > Yeah, and naming them with my new vanity names will help me keep them straight, but 'dladm show-phys' will map the vanity names back tothe swapped physical names still. If this was the only machine like this I wouldn't care, but since there are so many, I might hack it anyway just to keep them all the same.
Nah, actually i'll probably be reinstalling this thing again as soon as b94 is out. It'll resolve itself then. -Kyle _______________________________________________ networking-discuss mailing list [email protected]
