Rao Shoaib wrote: > I agree, Since sockets semantics should not be tied to TCP behavior I > wanted to make sure that other protocols that use urgent data and might > use our code to build their sockets will work.
Everyone (I believe...) thinks that the urgent pointer is a mistake
in TCP. So I don't think there will be any protocol which requires
this in future.
--
K. Poon.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
networking-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
