http://original.antiwar.com/malic/2010/09/10/capitulation-not-compromise/

Capitulation, Not Compromise

UN Adopts "Serbian" Resolution

by Nebojsa Malic <http://original.antiwar.com/author/malic/> , September 11, 
2010 

A sordid spectacle unfolded at the United Nations on Thursday, as the 
government of Serbia unconditionally surrendered to the Empire, ingloriously 
ending the two-year charade of "peaceful and diplomatic struggle" over its 
occupied province of Kosovo.

Two years ago, following the declaration 
<http://original.antiwar.com/malic/2008/02/22/day-of-infamy/>  by the 
UN-established provisional government that the NATO-occupied province was an 
independent state, the government in Belgrade decided to "fight back" by taking 
its case to the UN. In October 2008, it won 
<http://original.antiwar.com/malic/2008/10/16/cheap-thrills/>  the overwhelming 
support of the General Assembly to ask for an advisory opinion from the 
International Court of Justice. In late July this year, the ICJ opined that the 
declaration wasn’t really illegal, employing sophistry 
<http://original.antiwar.com/malic/2010/07/22/cry-havoc/>  and verbal 
acrobatics to support the conclusion. The regime in Belgrade reacted by 
drafting a resolution for the General Assembly that condemned unilateral 
secession and called for new negotiations.

For a brief moment, it appeared as if the government — installed 
<http://original.antiwar.com/malic/2008/06/26/return-of-the-reds/>  in 2008 by 
the U.S. and EU ambassadors — might have slipped its leash and stood up for its 
country. Then the foreign ministers of Germany 
<http://original.antiwar.com/malic/2010/08/27/westerwelles-big-adventure/>  and 
the UK 
<http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5jgdPlZ821CBEbDAzHet_6ZeprT2gD9HUJA7G1>
  came calling, and the façade of false patriotism crumbled overnight. 
President Tadic and Foreign Minister Jeremic eagerly accepted a "compromise" 
offered by the EU: have Brussels rewrite the resolution to EU’s liking in 
exchange for… nothing at all.

The new resolution welcomed the ICJ decision, thanked the court for "careful 
consideration" of the question presented, gave a blanket endorsement to the EU 
and implicitly recognized an independent Kosovo. The UN General Assembly 
approved it by acclamation. Voting would have simply been in bad taste.

The Fatal Section "F"

There was no doubt in the English-speaking press as to what the resolution 
meant. For example: "Serbia drops UN challenge to Kosovo independence," 
proclaimed the Guardian on Wednesday, when the text of the "compromise" 
resolution became public. "Serbia backs down on UN challenge to independent 
Kosovo," echoed a headline over an AP story 
<http://www.smh.com.au/world/serbia-backs-down-on-un-challenge-to-independent-kosovo-20100909-153bg.html>
  in the Sydney Morning Herald on Friday.

Meanwhile, Serbian President Tadic openly lied to his people that the new 
resolution specifically "excludes recognition of Kosovo’s independence."

Does it? Rather, the entire resolution an implicit recognition of the breakaway 
province. This is made crystal clear in the last section of the text 
<http://www.srbija.gov.rs/vesti/vest.php?id=68730> :

"f) Welcomes the readiness of the EU to facilitate the process of dialogue 
between the parties. The process of dialogue by itself would be a factor of 
peace, security and stability in the region. This dialogue would be aimed to 
promote cooperation, make progress on the path towards the EU and improve 
people’s lives."

As anyone can see, the province’s status won’t be subject to discussion. The 
only things on the table are "cooperation" and joining the EU. The 
self-proclaimed government in Pristina is considered an equal party to 
Belgrade. And since the "dialogue" is defined as a factor of peace, security 
and stability by itself, it doesn’t even have to result in anything. This is 
not a compromise — it is a total capitulation to EU demands, an unconditional 
surrender.

Some of the remaining Serbs of Kosovo seem to have reached the same conclusion; 
they are seeking Russian citizenship <http://serbianna.com/news/?p=6206> .

Insult to Injury

Even though the Empire thus got Serbia to publicly humiliate itself, renounce 
any claims to justice, and even endorse its ongoing occupation and 
dismemberment, that wasn’t quite enough. Representatives of the "Republic of 
Kosovo" were brought to the chamber to bear witness. The Serbian delegation 
objected. After a two-hour delay, they were told to sit down and shut up; the 
"Kosovars" were "guests" of the five European powers and the U.S., and they 
would be allowed to stay. The incident was reported as yet another instance of 
Serbia causing trouble and "forcing" Britain and France to "negotiate a 
settlement" (AFP 
<http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5gX8faiPjLD5bsQgwf4m2d4VsYf1Q>
 ).

In 2006, the UN launched "status talks" about Kosovo, wherein NATO envoy Martti 
Ahtisaari pretended to talk to Belgrade and the separatist Albanians. His 
proposed  
<http://original.antiwar.com/malic/2007/02/08/ahtisaaris-final-solution/> 
"compromise" solution was an independent Kosovo; for that absurdity he later 
got the Nobel Peace Prize 
<http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5g5l2fRFVwVBwe7Ra-93Sz-pK9xSQ> . Even 
before Ahtissaari’s proposal was made public, French newspaper Le Figaro quoted 
one UN official, who described the whole farce thus 
<http://grayfalcon.blogspot.com/2006/06/voluntary-rape.html> :

"Serbia will be ‘voluntarily raped’- namely, Belgrade will be required to 
declare the rape consensual after the fact, and then be given hush money by the 
rich playboy responsible for the act, in this case the EU." 

The prediction was only half right. Belgrade was indeed required to declare the 
rape consensual. However, with the Tadic regime declaring that the rape was 
actually good, the "hush money" — in whatever form — became unnecessary.

The Grand Betrayal

Boris Tadic was suspected of being Empire’s willing servant 
<http://www.antiwar.com/malic/m071901.html>  even before he became President of 
Serbia in 2004. He offered proof when his inauguration was set up to mimic that 
of the American presidents, and when he flew to Washington to swear fealty just 
days later. He proved it further later that year, with a sycophantic letter to 
Emperor Bush <http://original.antiwar.com/malic/2004/09/30/most-humbly-yours> . 
But his clownish behavior 
<http://original.antiwar.com/malic/2005/09/29/laughable-sycophancy/>  was 
merely a mask for outright treason 
<http://original.antiwar.com/malic/2007/04/19/war-of-words/> . It is no 
coincidence that the Albanian provisional government declared an independent 
Kosovo right after Tadic’s re-election 
<http://original.antiwar.com/malic/2008/02/07/dead-end/>  in February 2008; 
Tadic and his party sabotaged the government’s response to the declaration. By 
July 2008, they had formed a majority government that nobody in Serbia voted 
for, but the Empire openly supported.

To get elected, Tadic promised the Serbs "both Kosovo and the EU." Though 22 
out of the 27 EU members have recognized the occupied province as an Albanian 
state, and have explicitly conditioned Serbia’s hypothetical accession with the 
recognition of an independent "Republic of Kosova," Tadic’s control over the 
media and all levers of government has ensured that Serbia remained in a state 
of cognitive dissonance <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognitive_dissonance> . 
In such complete and utter confusion, Tadic can claim to be a patriot — because 
"treason" doesn’t mean anything any more.

Yet what he did with the resolution was treason, pure and simple. Worse yet, 
Tadic’s betrayal went beyond Serbia. It was a slap in the face to all the 
countries — more than two thirds of the world — that had so far refused to 
recognize Empire’s conquest of Kosovo. And it was a betrayal of hope that 
Serbia’s ongoing resistance to Imperial diktat could have held out for other 
people around the world faced with similarly bleak prospects. Every government, 
every power, ultimately rests on the consent of the governed. Despite the 
blockade, the bombs and the media demonization, the Empire could never fully 
impose its will without Serbia’s agreement. And anyone refusing to consent to 
Imperial will was a threat. Serbia had to be broken, as an example to others 
<http://www.antiwar.com/deliso/?articleid=6338> .

As former PM Vojislav Kostunica put it, it was "especially humiliating that 
many countries trying to defend Serbia in the General Assembly had no one to 
defend. Serbia gave up defending itself."

No Victory

Is this a triumph for the Empire, then? Or could it be that this is merely the 
latest push against the fabric of actual reality, yet another brick in the 
edifice of lies <http://www.antiwar.com/malic/m110603.html> , which will make 
the eventual collapse so much more disastrous once reality pushes back?

Tadic is finished; not because he has just about run out of Serbia to 
sacrifice, but because the Empire doesn’t need him anymore. Already several 
"opposition" politicians in Serbia are lining up to be Empire’s new favorite 
sycophants. They must have missed the memo that the Empire won’t be around 
<http://original.antiwar.com/eland/2010/09/07/no-tears-needed/>  much longer.

_______________________________________________
News mailing list
News@antic.org
http://lists.antic.org/mailman/listinfo/news

Reply via email to