Editorial

Balkans, Past and Future


Published: October 10, 2010


Bosnia, Serbia and Kosovo have come a long way since the 1990s. Serbia is no 
longer a rogue aggressor. Bosnia is no longer a killing field. And Kosovo, once 
a terrorized province of Serbia, is now an independent state. Washington and, 
in particular, former President Bill Clinton deserve a large share of the 
credit. 

When Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton visits all three states this 
week, she will need to press them to continue the reforms, and the diplomacy, 
that are essential to their transition to a democratic, prosperous peace. 

There is still an extraordinary amount of old business to resolve. President 
Boris Tadic of Serbia is eager for his country to join the European Union and 
has worked to lower regional tensions. This spring Belgrade finally accepted 
responsibility and apologized for the wartime Srebrenica massacre. But the 
government has yet to locate and hand over the military leader directly 
responsible for that crime, Gen. Ratko Mladic, for trial in The Hague, as 
Europe insists. 

Belgrade still refuses to recognize Kosovo’s independence, but has agreed to 
European Union-mediated talks. Mrs. Clinton should press both sides to engage 
seriously. Kosovo’s ethnic Albanian majority, whose rights Washington went to 
war to defend, must also do a better job of protecting its own ethnic Serb 
minority. 

Bosnia’s hugely complex political institutions, cobbled together at Dayton, are 
badly hobbling its progress. Fifteen years later, its two rival ministates (one 
predominantly Serb, the other mainly Muslim-Croat) with a three-person 
presidency can barely make decisions on essential issues. These include 
resettling refugees, resolving property disputes and deciding whether the 
national government or ministates should control former Yugoslav military 
buildings and equipment. 

In national elections this month, Muslims and Croats chose moderate, more 
nationally minded representatives. The Bosnian Serbs elected leaders who are 
still calling for secession. Mrs. Clinton must make clear to the Bosnian Serbs 
that partition means isolation, while cooperation will open opportunities to 
join the wider European economy. She should also press the case for reforming 
the Dayton arrangements to create a unified, functioning state. 

The chance for European Union membership is the best incentive for these three 
countries to move ahead. But recession and resurgent German nationalism have 
weakened the authority of E.U. institutions. The United States will have to 
stay strongly engaged to see things through. 


A version of this editorial appeared in print on October 11, 2010, on page A22 
of the New York edition.


http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/11/opinion/11mon2.html?_r=1

_______________________________________________
News mailing list
News@antic.org
http://lists.antic.org/mailman/listinfo/news

Reply via email to