In response to Wil and Charles, I do study each zeep call, by sound and spectrogram, to make the most reasonable id possible. In a number of cases, and at my current level of competency, I would simply be making a wild guess as to species. Those I id to the genus level, Setophaga, since all common zeep warblers here are of that genus except Northern Waterthrush. Especially weak or poorly formed zeep calls may be classified only to the family level, Parulidae. The same procedure is followed for other warbler or sparrow call complexes.
From: bounce-65439109-28417...@list.cornell.edu [mailto:bounce-65439109-28417...@list.cornell.edu] On Behalf Of Francis,Charles [NCR] Sent: September 20, 2012 18:26 To: John Kearney; Erik Johnson; Nocturnal Flight Call ListServe Subject: RE: [nfc-l] ID of NFCs John et al., For many purposes related to bird monitoring, recording a best-guess species ID is better than nothing. Assigning a confidence to the ID would enhance the value, though it will be hard to assign objectively. However, for NFC that were digitally recorded (unlike field observations), we also have the option to archive the actual recording of the flight call, so that any future analyst can go back and revisit the identifications and make their own classifications. I hope that at some point in the not-too-distant future, we'll be able to work out some sort of a web-based database where people like yourselves who are recording NFC can upload all the clips, along with the metadata (time, date, location, etc.). That would allow for much greater value than simply a list of what species were recorded on each date. Presumably most of you are keeping at least the sound clips of each call you detected, so that when such a database is created, you can upload them all. Andrew Farnsworth and I co-chaired a workshop at the North American Ornithological Congress in August about acoustic monitoring, and there was a lot of interest from multiple groups to create these types of data bases, both for flight calls as well as other types of recording projects. We hope that over the next year or two we'll be seeing a lot of progress. Charles M. Francis, PhD Manager, Bird Population Monitoring Canadian Wildlife Service, Environment Canada 1125 Colonel By, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1A 0H3 charles.fran...@ec.gc.ca Telephone 613-998-0332 Facsimile 613-998-0458 _____ From: bounce-65390135-25320...@list.cornell.edu [mailto:bounce-65390135-25320...@list.cornell.edu] On Behalf Of John Kearney Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2012 12:32 PM To: 'Erik Johnson'; 'Nocturnal Flight Call ListServe' Subject: RE: [nfc-l] ID of NFCs Very good points Erik. Thank you for your response. From: bounce-65390107-28417...@list.cornell.edu [mailto:bounce-65390107-28417...@list.cornell.edu] On Behalf Of Erik Johnson Sent: September 20, 2012 13:26 To: Nocturnal Flight Call ListServe Subject: Re: [nfc-l] ID of NFCs John, I recall a post on this list serve a few years back (Mike Lanzone in PA?) where it was mentioned that Savannah Sparrows were a common NFC, but were rarely encountered on the ground. I suspect given the diversity of habitats that our migrants use, it would be really tricky to make direct comparisons because your ground counts are so dependent on the habitat you are in. But it might work for certain species that you sample well on the ground, as you say. And of course, something like eBird that compiles observations across sites (and skill levels, and all the other biases of bird watching), starts to get at a more regional picture of what is expected when. I like the idea of probabilistic identification (and FYI, Ted Floyd blogged about this on his ABA blog a couple months back - interesting concept). Maybe eBird contains the "prior" that one needs to generate probabilities around flight call complex "identification"? Erik Johnson S Lafayette, LA ejohn33 AT lsu.edu ejohnson AT audubon.org On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 11:07 AM, John Kearney <john.kear...@ns.sympatico.ca> wrote: The discussion today reminds me of a similar train of thought that I've been pondering lately. Namely, in today's world of birding and ornithology, we require a high of degree of certainty when it comes to documenting the classification of our observations to the species level. Basically, photographic proof has become almost essential for rare species. When it comes to night flight calls, the certitude of species identification becomes very problematic. I am concerned that we might apply similar standards to NFC identification as to bird observations. Should we rather think of NFC IDs more in terms of probabilities and error bars than certitude? I personally feel this approach is worth pursuing if we wish to make more of a contribution to bird migration and aeroecology. For example, where I in live in Nova Scotia, the "zeep" warblers can be boiled down to about 6 species that are difficult to identify. Thus while I might not be able to distinguish the NFC of a Yellow Warbler from a Blackpoll Warbler, it is very probable that this type of call in early August is a Yellow Warbler and such a call in early September is a Blackpoll Warbler. This breakdown of all the zeep warblers into probability categories is much more useful, I believe, for understanding regional migration patterns than having them all lumped as zeep warblers because we can't be certain of their identification to the species level. How we calculate these probabilities is another question. I have been doing stop-over transects in areas close to a recording station. Although this analysis is not completed, I sense that there may be some interesting correlations to be made between the species composition of nocturnal migration and stop-over areas within a certain time frame. -- NFC-L List Info: <http://www.northeastbirding.com/NFC_WELCOME> Welcome and Basics <http://www.northeastbirding.com/NFC_RULES> Rules and Information <http://www.northeastbirding.com/NFC-L_SubscribeConfigurationLeave.htm> Subscribe, Configuration and Leave Archives: <http://www.mail-archive.com/nfc-l@cornell.edu/maillist.html> The Mail Archive <http://www.surfbirds.com/birdingmail/Group/NFC-L> Surfbirds <http://birdingonthe.net/mailinglists/NFCL.html> BirdingOnThe.Net Please submit your observations to eBird <http://ebird.org/content/ebird/> ! -- -- NFC-L List Info: <http://www.northeastbirding.com/NFC_WELCOME> Welcome and Basics <http://www.northeastbirding.com/NFC_RULES> Rules and Information <http://www.northeastbirding.com/NFC-L_SubscribeConfigurationLeave.htm> Subscribe, Configuration and Leave Archives: <http://www.mail-archive.com/nfc-l@cornell.edu/maillist.html> The Mail Archive <http://www.surfbirds.com/birdingmail/Group/NFC-L> Surfbirds <http://birdingonthe.net/mailinglists/NFCL.html> BirdingOnThe.Net Please submit your observations to eBird <http://ebird.org/content/ebird/> ! -- -- NFC-L List Info: <http://www.northeastbirding.com/NFC_WELCOME> Welcome and Basics <http://www.northeastbirding.com/NFC_RULES> Rules and Information <http://www.northeastbirding.com/NFC-L_SubscribeConfigurationLeave.htm> Subscribe, Configuration and Leave Archives: <http://www.mail-archive.com/nfc-l@cornell.edu/maillist.html> The Mail Archive <http://www.surfbirds.com/birdingmail/Group/NFC-L> Surfbirds <http://birdingonthe.net/mailinglists/NFCL.html> BirdingOnThe.Net Please submit your observations to eBird <http://ebird.org/content/ebird/> ! -- -- NFC-L List Info: <http://www.northeastbirding.com/NFC_WELCOME> Welcome and Basics <http://www.northeastbirding.com/NFC_RULES> Rules and Information <http://www.northeastbirding.com/NFC-L_SubscribeConfigurationLeave.htm> Subscribe, Configuration and Leave Archives: <http://www.mail-archive.com/nfc-l@cornell.edu/maillist.html> The Mail Archive <http://www.surfbirds.com/birdingmail/Group/NFC-L> Surfbirds <http://birdingonthe.net/mailinglists/NFCL.html> BirdingOnThe.Net Please submit your observations to eBird <http://ebird.org/content/ebird/> ! -- -- NFC-L List Info: http://www.NortheastBirding.com/NFC_WELCOME http://www.NortheastBirding.com/NFC_RULES http://www.NortheastBirding.com/NFC-L_SubscribeConfigurationLeave.htm ARCHIVES: 1) http://www.mail-archive.com/nfc-l@cornell.edu/maillist.html 2) http://www.surfbirds.com/birdingmail/Group/NFC-L 3) http://birdingonthe.net/mailinglists/NFCL.html Please submit your observations to eBird: http://ebird.org/content/ebird/ --
