Hi Dave,
This morphing is IMHO related to Brexit and an attempt to see how/if regulatory
divergence from continental Europe can be converted into an economic advantage.
The ofcom positions seem not really all that far from european regulations on
the fact level, while on a rhetorical level it tries to look business
friendly... (without changes in the UK law they hardly can do more).
My point is the European NN regulations were never all that strict and business
stifling as some here seem to presume.
On 31 October 2023 18:37:16 CET, Dave Taht <dave.t...@gmail.com> wrote:
>I am still looking for the history of this morphing...
>
>https://decoded.legal/blog/2023/10/ofcoms-new-guidance-on-open-internet--net-neutrality-including-zero-rating-and-traffic-management/
>
>On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 9:33 AM Dave Taht <dave.t...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> This link is working now.
>>
>> https://www.ofcom.org.uk/consultations-and-statements/category-1/net-neutrality-review
>>
>> I had reached out to multiple folk I knew to fix it. It is hugely
>> ironic that we have run into multiple examples of both intentional and
>> unintentional censorship so far in our quest to find truths about
>> network neutrality all around the globe.
>>
>> Annoyed, I set up a server in london, and mirrored the site myself via
>> "wget -m" - a command line utility that lets you make complete copies
>> of websites shipped as part of most operating systems. ... Back in the
>> day when the open internet meant you can copy a website and read it
>> offline, easily...
>>
>> And then I shipped it all to my own laptop (where I can index it
>> myself), via another quite common tool, rsync. It took a while to do
>> that - started the rsync in america, and then finished it at a coffee
>> shop in vancouver... then I read the 5 pdfs and deleted the thing
>> because I needed the disk space.
>>
>> Seeing so many newer folk having missed JPB's observation that the
>> internet is a "copying machine" ... if only more people would point
>> out to those folk these basic tools exist, that cannot be banned, and
>> are genuinely useful....
>>
>> OK... so...
>>
>> This now globally(? please test) accessible cloudflare instance for
>> ofcom is now throwing an error 429 (too many requests) so I no longer
>> have that ability to quickly mirror it that I had had only a few days
>> ago. Is this an improvement?
>>
>> Anyway, I can finally get towards commenting on the actual text. But
>> not today. I would like to see various statements written about
>> network neutrality in 2005, 2010, 2015, because it seems to be the
>> definition in the ofcom docs has morphed a lot towards being...
>> "reasonable", whatever that means.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Oct 28, 2023 at 3:01 AM Sebastian Moeller via Nnagain
>> <nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
>> >
>> > Dear All,
>> >
>> > I have been pointed at Ofcom's statement on Net neutrality for October
>> > 2023:
>> >
>> > https://www.ofcom.org.uk/consultations-and-statements/category-1/net-neutrality-review
>> >
>> > Here is the meat of that statement sans the links at the end (the email
>> > will be clasified as spam if it contains too many links, I hope the one
>> > above does not trigger it yet):
>> >
>> > Statement published 26 October 2023
>> >
>> > Net neutrality supports the ‘open internet’, ensuring that users of the
>> > internet (both consumers and those making and distributing content) are in
>> > control of what they see and do online – not the broadband or mobile
>> > providers (otherwise known as internet service providers or ISPs). The net
>> > neutrality rules make sure that the traffic carried across broadband and
>> > mobile networks is treated equally and particular content or services are
>> > not prioritised or slowed down in a way that favours some over others. We
>> > want to make sure that as technology evolves and more of our lives move
>> > online, net neutrality continues to support innovation, investment and
>> > growth, by both content providers and ISPs.
>> >
>> > The current net neutrality rules are set out in legislation. Any changes
>> > to the rules in future would be a matter for Government and Parliament.
>> > Ofcom is responsible for monitoring and ensuring compliance with the rules
>> > and providing guidance on how ISPs should follow them. In 2021 we started
>> > a review of net neutrality.
>> >
>> > Our review has found that, in general, it has worked well and supported
>> > consumer choice as well as enabling content providers to deliver their
>> > content and services to consumers. However, there are specific areas where
>> > we provide more clarity in our guidance to enable ISPs to innovate and
>> > manage their networks more efficiently, to improve consumer outcome.
>> >
>> > • ISPs can offer premium quality retail offers: Allowing ISPs to
>> > provide premium quality retail packages means they can better meet some
>> > consumers’ needs. For example, people who use high quality virtual reality
>> > applications may want to buy a premium quality service, while users who
>> > mainly stream and browse the internet can buy a cheaper package. Our
>> > updated guidance clarifies that ISPs can offer premium packages, for
>> > example offering low latency, as long as they are sufficiently clear to
>> > customers about what they can expect from the services they buy.
>> > • ISPs can develop new ‘specialised services’: New 5G and full
>> > fibre networks offer the opportunity for ISPs to innovate and develop
>> > their services. Our updated guidance clarifies when they can provide
>> > ‘specialised services’ to deliver specific content and applications that
>> > need to be optimised, which might include real time communications,
>> > virtual reality and driverless vehicles.
>> > • ISPs can use traffic management measures to manage their
>> > networks: Traffic management can be used by ISPs on their networks, so
>> > that a good quality of service is maintained for consumers. Our updated
>> > guidance clarifies when and how ISPs can use traffic management, including
>> > the different approaches they can take and how they can distinguish
>> > between different categories of traffic based on their technical
>> > requirements.
>> > • Most zero-rating offers will be allowed: Zero-rating is where
>> > the data used by certain websites or apps is not counted towards a
>> > customer’s overall data allowance. Our updated guidance clarifies that we
>> > will generally allow these offers, while setting out the limited
>> > circumstances where we might have concerns.
>> >
>> >
>> > I note however, that when I try to access that page today I get a
>> > cloadflare error:
>> > Sorry, you have been blocked
>> > You are unable to access ofcom.squizedge.cloud
>> >
>> > Which might indicate that some parts of the network are not acting in good
>> > faith (or I was just unlucky with my current IP address)
>> >
>> > I also note (as Ofcom does itself) that since Brexit the UK is not bound
>> > to the EU's regulation 2015/2120 (see
>> > https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/de/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32015R2120 ).
>> >
>> > Regards
>> > Sebastian
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Nnagain mailing list
>> > Nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net
>> > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/nnagain
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Oct 30: https://netdevconf.info/0x17/news/the-maestro-and-the-music-bof.html
>> Dave Täht CSO, LibreQos
>
>
>
>--
>Oct 30: https://netdevconf.info/0x17/news/the-maestro-and-the-music-bof.html
>Dave Täht CSO, LibreQos
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
_______________________________________________
Nnagain mailing list
Nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/nnagain
