W2Knews[tm] (the original NTools E-News) Electronic Newsletter Vol. 5, #15- April 3, 2000 Published by sunbelt-software.com since 1996 - ISSN: 1527-3407 'Immediate Notification Of Important Windows NT/2000 Events' ******************* over 600,000 SUBSCRIBERS***************** R U S H - K I L L E R V I R U S A L E R T! Hi Everybody, I received this from a very reliable source (SANS) when 25% of the newsletter had been sent. I decided to interrupt the job, and resend it. I hope it arrives early enough for you. R U S H - K I L L E R V I R U S A L E R T! At 8:00 am on Saturday, April 1 (This is not an April Fool's joke!) the FBI announced it had discovered malicious code wiping out the data on hard drives and dialing 911. This is a vicious virus and needs to be stopped quickly. That can only be done through wide-scale individual action. Please forward this note to everyone who you know who might be affected. The FBI Advisory is posted at http://www.nipc.gov/nipc/advis00-038.htm The 911 virus is the first "Windows shares virus." Unlike recent viruses that propagate though eMail, the 911 virus silently jumps directly from machine to machine across the Internet by scanning for, and exploiting, open Windows shares. After successfully reproducing itself in other Internet-connected machines (to assure its continued survival) it uses the machine's modem to dial 911 and erases the local machine's hard drive. The virus is operational; victims are already reporting wiped-out hard drives. The virus was launched through AOL, AT&T, MCI, and NetZero in the Houston area. The investigation points to relatively limited distribution so far, but there are no walls in the Internet. ----------------- Action 1: Defense ----------------- Verify that your system and those of all your coworkers, friends, and associates are not vulnerable by verifying that file sharing is turned off. * On a Windows 95/98 system, system-wide file sharing is managed by selecting My Computer, Control Panel, Networks, and clicking on the File and Print Sharing button. For folder-by-folder controls, you can use Windows Explorer (Start, Programs, Windows Explorer) and highlight a primary folder such as My Documents and then right mouse click and select properties. There you will find a tab for sharing. * On a Windows NT, check Control Panel, Server, Shares. For an excellent way to instantly check system vulnerability, and for detailed assistance in managing Windows file sharing, see: Shields Up! A free service from Gibson Research (http://grc.com/) ------------------- Action 2: Forensics ------------------- If you find that you did have file sharing turned on, search your hard drive for hidden directories named "chode", "foreskin", or "dickhair" (we apologize for the indiscretion - but those are the real directory names). These are HIDDEN directories, so you must configure the Find command to show hidden directories. Under the Windows Explorer menu choose View/Options: "Show All Files". If you find those directories: remove them. And, if you find them, and want help from law enforcement, call the FBI National Infrastructure Protection Center (NIPC) Watch Office at 202-323-3204/3205/3206. The FBI/NIPC has done an extraordinary job of getting data out early on this virus and deserves both kudos and cooperation. You can help the whole community by letting both the FBI and SANS ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) know if you've been hit, so we can monitor the spread of this virus. -------------- Moving Forward -------------- The virus detection companies received a copy of the code for the 911 Virus early this morning, so keep your virus signature files up-to-date. We'll post new information at www.sans.org as it becomes available. Prepared by: Alan Paller, Research Director, The SANS Institute Steve Gibson, President, Gibson Research Corporation Stephen Northcutt, Director, Global Incident Analysis Center ****************************************************** We continue our normal broadcast with W2Knews below :-) ****************************************************** This Issue of W2Knews contains: 1. EDITORS CORNER: * Failed W2K Notebook experiment 2. CERTIFICATION BRIEFING: * Ed Tittel's Continuing Windows 2000 MCSE Saga 3. NT RELATED NEWS: * IBM & Microsoft team up and sell web appliance servers * Office 2000 SR-1 breaks Windows 2000 4. NT THIRD PARTY NEWS: * April Product Of The Month: Security Explorer 5. HINTS AND TIPS: * Outlook dupe remover / LCD-screen caveat 6. THE NT/2000 STOCK WATCH - Friday March 31, 2000 * Just have a look at the bloodbath this week! 7. HOW TO USE THE MAILING LIST Instructions on how to subscribe, sign off or change your address. *************************SPONSOR******************************** Check out the new Windows 2000 Magazine Network. Not only can you access great content from 11 Web sites in the Windows 2000 Magazine family, you can zero in on answers from sources you know and trust. We've divided our content into convenient channels to allow you to broaden your knowledge about specific topics without having to bounce around from site to site. It's well worth a look. http://www.win2000mag.net/ **********************WHAT IS W2Knews?*************************** Sunbelt W2Knews (the original NTools E-News) is the World's first and largest E-Newsletter designed for NT/2000 System Managers that have the job to get and keep NT up & running in a production environment. Sunbelt launched this electronic newsletter early 1996. Every week we keep the Windows NT/2000 community informed and aware of new developments of NT and 3-rd party System Management Tools. You get hints and tips that will enable you to better utilize and understand Win NT/2000 and help to pass your Certification Exams. Info and Stu's bio: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/w2knews.htm Via (separate) NTools E-NewsFlashes we will send you important breaking news like new service packs, killer viruses, etc. Sunbelt Software is the first and largest provider worldwide of Third Party System Management Tools for Windows NT. Tell Your Friends! All back issues are here, searchable and indexed on key words: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=nt-list&text_mode=0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. "EDITORS CORNER" Hi NT/W2K Pro's, I did a small W2K experiment. When you read this, I have been to Paris, France and back for a one day trip. Quite a commute, but worth it. I needed a small machine to work on during the flight, and since my handheld HP Jornada completely died on my recent trip to the W2K launch in San Francisco, I decided to try out another lightweight system. I was not all that happy with the Jornada to begin with. Windows CE was a pain to keep connected via the RAS services on my NT 4.0 workstation. Unwieldy to say the least, and prone to errors. For instance a reinstall of some software nixed my local admin rights and that broke the link between the two systems. Definitely not a way to keep things working. Synchronization needs to be a lot better than THAT! I found myself not using the CE machine after a month or two and that is a bad sign. So, I popped over to CompUSA and asked them what is the lightest system with the longest battery life. They came up with a Sony Vaio. It's a very light and cute, well designed machine with W98 running on it. Pentium II, 333Mhz, 64Meg RAM and loaded with ports. It has a very workable keyboard and a great touchpad. The cost was a bit pricey ($1,700) but it's only 3.1 pounds so I decided to go ahead with it. As this was brand new hardware I also picked up a copy of a new, shrinkwrapped Windows 2000 Professional, and decided to install it just to see what would happen. First of all I made sure I would be able to roll back to the original configuration. Sony provides two CD's that reformat and reinstall the whole hard disk to a clean W98 environment so that was all hunky dory. Then I decided to 'play end-user'. (That means do not read manuals, do not read the readme.txt, do not check the MS website for any indications regarding compatibility, and just plug the CD in) :-) Well, W2K went through the whole install in about an hour. It did tell me that some components would not work, like the Sony power management features and the Hayes 56Modem. 'Allright, I can live without those' I thought and plowed ahead. The process seemed to go fairly smooth. W2K came up and it looked initially that everything worked. I could fire up Word97 that came with the Vaio after bootup, but only if I did it immediately. W2K got me up to the screen with the Vaio wall-paper and Icons, but if I did nothing, the whole thing went blank after 15 seconds and the only thing possible was the three-finger-salute to log off the W2K session. When it came back up after a new login, same thing happened, even after turning the whole thing off and pull the battery for a couple of minutes. Looks like I should have read all the manuals and run the compatibility tests, and generally do what MS tells people to do. (just found out: I need to update the BIOS of the Vaio first and then install W2K again. I have found the Sony site has a page with instructions) Since I had to leave the next morning and did not have time to debug the whole thing, I reinstalled W98 from scratch and the Vaio is a happy camper again. I'm writing this section in the plane to France. Only thing I do not like about it is they pushed the DEL key _all_ the way top right, on the Jornada it was all the way down to the right and that is a much more useful spot. Oh well. Lesson Learned: Be very, very sure that the hardware you plan to install W2K on, is compatible and that all the drivers for the peripherals and internal stuff are actually there, and you have the correct BIOS versions. Warm regards, Stu. Email me with feedback at: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PS. Thanks for your extremely positive feedback about our new website design. Everybody loved the improvements. Not looked yet? Do so now. http://www.sunbelt-software.com/index.htm *************************SPONSOR******************************** NOW EMAIL AND FAX ARE ONE! Need an easy, reliable, and cost effective solution to managing enterprise messaging in-house? NetMoves, the leader in fully outsourced messaging offer production, e-commerce and desktop faxing solutions without hardware, software, or phone lines. http://www.netmoves.com/cgi-bin/url?who=Sunbelt&what=mailer **************************************************************** 2. CERTIFICATION BRIEFING: The Continuing Windows 2000 MCSE Saga Shades of Robert Altman's movie 'Network'. As Albert Finney's character exhorted the world to yell: "I'm mad as hell, and I'm not gonna take it any more!" so have many MCSEs been voicing their dissatisfaction about the terms and conditions of the Windows 3.51 and 4.0 MCSE "upgrade" to Windows 2000 MCSE. Love 'em or hate 'em, these guys are getting seriously bent on this subject. In a nutshell, here are the most common complaints: 1. The Windows NT 4.0 MCSE is being retired unfairly early. Indeed, when compared to the 3.51 MCSE, which persisted for nearly four years after its successor was released, the 4.0 MCSE is only remaining in effect for 22 months after Windows 2000 was released. 2. The timing on exam retirement for NT 4.0 exams--12/31/00-- is coming much sooner than most people would like. Many in- process MCSE's are concerned about being able to finish the 4.0 program in time to qualify for the "upgrade" terms. 3. The ability to take the 70-240 Accelerated Windows 2000 exam only once is perceived as a huge problem. Since this exam covers the same ground as four core Windows 2000 exams, lots of MCSEs are concerned that they won't pass on their first try, and will then have to pay $400 to take all four of those core exams anyway (70-210 Professional, 70-215 Server, 70-216 Network Infrastructure, and 70-217 Network Security). 4. Those who don't pass 70-240 and whose electives don't transfer to Windows 2000 MCSE will essentially have to get a new Windows 2000 MCSE all over again. This is perceived by many as more of a form of punishment, than as an upgrade path. I have to agree with this. 5. The invitation-only nature of the new beta exams is perceived by many as a way of adding to the mystery and fear factor inherent in any new exams. Since Microsoft's announcements of the new Windows 2000 MCSE curriculum and exam regime began appearing in September, 1999, I've heard from countless current and in-process MCSE's who have voiced the following opinions: 1. "The heck with Microsoft. I'm going to get [fill in the blank here] certified instead!" Linux and Cisco have been the most common alternative certifications offered by these fed-up folks. 2. "Let's revolt! If we all get together and tell Microsoft they can't do this to us, they will change their minds." To that end, a great many MCSEs have e-mailed or written Microsoft directly, while many others have signed the "Open Letter to Microsoft" spearheaded by Keith Weiskamp, my publisher at Coriolis (available on-line at http://www.coriolis.com/tellmicrosoft/default.asp). 3. "My company plans to use NT 4.0 until 2002. Let's form a group called XMCSE (for 'former MCSE') and use that as an alternative certification to let people know we are fully qualified to work with Windows NT 4.0." Lots of people are concerned that they're being pushed to become certified on a new operating system long before their companies need them to acquire this knowledge. Unfortunately, it's Microsoft's game, and they can play it however they want to. Witness this reply to the Coriolis "Open Letter...," from Donna M. Senko, Director of Microsoft's Certification and Skills Assessment organization (see also my commentary at the end of each paragraph, clearly marked as such): [Begin quote] Dear Mr. Weiskamp and Coriolis Web site visitors, Thank you for sharing your thoughts and concerns regarding our recent decisions on the Microsoft certification program. We are noting the concerns and strong reactions that are expressed on the Coriolis Web site and would like to take the opportunity to help your readers understand our recent program changes. We would also like to use this opportunity to share Microsoft's perspective on the definition of the Microsoft Certified Systems Engineer and the qualities of a meaningful certification credential. [Ed's rehash: "We've read your reader's responses to our new program and offering and it hasn't changed our plans one bit."] Microsoft created the Microsoft Certified Systems Engineer certification to provide leading systems engineers with a credential that would acknowledge their skills with Microsoft products. The credential was also intended to offer organizations a means to identify IT professionals who have the technical abilities to help them take advantage of the most advanced Microsoft technology and compete successfully in their industry. With Windows 2000, Microsoft has created a business operating system for the next generation of PC computing that provides organizations with huge benefits and opportunities. To ensure that the MCSE certification is recognized as a leading IT professional credential with value and credibility, it is critical that MCSEs be up to date on the most advanced technology available. [Ed's rehash: "Since Windows 2000 is Microsoft's new standard OS platform, we are requiring MCSEs to become conversant with that platform, whether or not that MCSE needs that knowledge right away." Among other things, I see this as a way to stimulate sales of Windows 2000, since MCSEs will need to obtain copies of the software to work with, just to prepare for their upgrade exams.] While we are aware that organizations make decisions to upgrade to a new technology based on numerous factors, we foresee that individuals who keep their certification current before their employer decides to upgrade will have a major advantage by being able to demonstrate that they are prepared to perform the upgrade. We expect any individuals who choose to certify in the MCSE track to assume a leadership role in helping their employers or clients stay competitive. And maintaining current certification shows that those individuals are fully equipped with the needed skills to meet that challenge. MCSEs are leaders in their field -- not followers. [Ed's rehash: "The product is shipping, and Microsoft has immediate needs to generate revenue from that product. Thus we are requiring our legions of certified individuals to obtain and learn this product to maintain their certifications, if for no other reason.] Some customers have expressed concern regarding the one-test- opportunity policy of Exam 70-240: Microsoft(r) Windows(r) 2000 Accelerated Exam for MCPs Certified on Microsoft(r) Windows NT(r) 4.0. To understand why this policy was instated, it is important to understand the accelerated exam's purpose and how it will help MCPs to upgrade. A major software release like Windows 2000 is a key element of the premier MCSE credential; comprehensive testing of upgraded skills is essential. Microsoft realizes that the new track will require considerable effort by current and aspiring MCSEs to meet the Windows 2000 certification requirements. However, for most MCPs, the major effort will be in acquiring the new skills -- not in taking the certification exams. [Ed's rehash: "Too bad if you don't like what we're doing with the Accelerated exam. You MCSEs should be grateful that we're offering it at all (and for FREE!) rather than requiring you to take all four core Windows 2000 exams." This is stated clearly in the next paragraph as well.] Historically, candidates upgrading their certification were required to be tested on the entire set of questions just the same as new candidates pursuing the certification for the first time. With the launch of the Windows 2000 track, we are offering the accelerated exam as a convenient way for candidates to make the transition to the Windows 2000 track. Offering this exam also acknowledges that candidates who have passed all three Windows NT 4.0 exams have some of the relevant skills required by the new Windows 2000 MCSE track. As part of our commitment to giving MCPs long-term benefits in return for their commitment to the program, Microsoft is offering the accelerated exam free to eligible candidates. [Ed's rehash: "You can get those four exams out of the way free, provided you spend $300 to take the three Windows NT 4.0 exams first, and pass the test on your first try." This is Microsoft's way of saying "Thanks" to MCSEs? Such a deal!] Exam 70-240: Microsoft(r) Windows(r) 2000 Accelerated Exam for MCPs Certified on Microsoft(r) Windows NT(r) 4.0 should be considered a convenient alternative to taking the four core exams, not a shortcut to achieving certification. However, to protect exam security and integrity, candidates are allowed to take the accelerated exam one time only. Individuals who regard the accelerated exam as too comprehensive or who fail the exam have the option of taking the four core exams individually, if they choose. [Ed's rehash: I am particularly enthralled with the phrase "...to protect exam security and integrity..." To me, this means "to prevent qualified professionals, like the Exam Cram crew, from taking the test several times to be able to help others prepare for what the test may contain." But then, I do have an axe to grind in this particular case. The option of taking the four exams costs $400, and takes a great deal more time and effort to schedule and execute.] Some MCSEs have expressed confusion on your site about the invitation-only beta exams. To clear up any confusion related to the selection criteria, I'd like to provide some background information on how candidates were selected to be invited to take the beta exams. The function of a beta exam is to collect data that can be used to predict how test candidates will perform on test questions before the exam is delivered in its live version. The sampling technique Microsoft used in the beta invitation process is supported by several decades of research in the study of educational and psychological measurement theory and statistics. Our goal was to ensure that the composition of the beta sample was as representative as possible of the ultimate target audience. [Ed's commentary: We have investigated the list of invitees to the beta exams, and have learned that the majority of those invitees were the MCTs who attended the MCT conference in New Orleans in February. We find it very interesting that Microsoft thinks that MCTs represent the "ultimate target audience," and have also garnered the consensus from those we talked to on this subject that this new approach means much harder MCSE exams for everyone. More on this subject in the next paragraph, too.] We believe it is the Microsoft Certified Professional program's responsibility to retain the value and relevance of the Microsoft Certified Systems Engineer credential as well as all other Microsoft Certified Professional credentials. The decisions the program has made ensure that MCSEs and organizations will continue to benefit from this credential in the future. [Ed's commentary: Microsoft is responding to concerns from more senior MCSEs and employers that their credential is becoming debased, and they are going to up the ante in terms of complexity and difficulty to control how easy it is to obtain an MCSE in the future. If you can't take the heat, stay out of the kitchen!] Windows 2000 provides enormous opportunities for Microsoft Certified Systems Engineers to help their companies and clients take advantage of a business operating system for the next generation of PC computing. MCSEs who have planned for and made the transition to Windows 2000 will have a significant advantage over uncertified individuals. MCSEs will need to invest time and effort in Windows 2000 as well, but we are confident that the ultimate payoff will be significant. [Ed's rehash: "You're either on the bus or off the bus. Those who jump on Windows 2000 will be able to get ahead; those who don't will fall by the wayside." Ouch!] For more information on the updates to the MCSE program, please visit: http://www.microsoft.com/mcp/certstep/mcsechanges.htm. Thank you for this opportunity to respond to your concerns. [End quote] In the final analysis, all that this so-called response from Microsoft represents is a rehash of materials they've already posted elsewhere on their Web site, in press releases, or in interviews with the trade press. They're not going to change their directions, or their attitudes, and you can either get with the program or get lost. Having followed Microsoft closely for over four years now, I am absolutely unsurprised by their response, and I do not expect them to deviate from this course one bit. Is it fair? Heck, no. Is it right? Maybe, maybe not-- it's Microsoft's game to play however they see fit. Is it the way things are going to be? You bet it is! If you don't like it, too bad... Am I being too cynical? too unfair to poor, put-upon Microsoft? Please let me know what you think, or if you have a different take on this situation. I'd love to hear from you, whether you think I'm right or wrong, or just crazy on this subject. I will cheer- fully confess to having spent way too much time thinking about it over the past 6 months. Thanks, Ed Tittel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] **************************************************************** 3. "NT RELATED NEWS" * IBM & MICROSOFT TEAM UP AND SELL WEB APPLIANCE SERVERS On March 29, IBM and Microsoft announced that they will sell a low-cost W2K-based computer for managing Web sites. This is the first time that MS enters the appliance market for systems geared to be web servers. This particular market is expected to have cumulative revenues of over $30 billion through the end of 2004, according to International Data Corp. The new appliance server is called the IBM Netfinity A-100. The A stands for Appliance. The software for the A100 sits on a version of Win2K Advanced Server that Microsoft customized for IBM. MS has disabled (not removed) some parts of W2K that are not needed for web servers and optimized others to work with the IBM wares. IBM has added software that can boost the appliance's speed and deliver information more quickly to Internet users. The A100 web server appliance comes in three configurations. An entry-level powered by a 650MHz Pentium III with 512MB of RAM, a 9GB drive and dual 10/1000 Ethernet NICs is $6,000. A mid-range with two 650MHz Pentium IIIs, 1GB of memory and a pair of drives is $8,000. A high-performance box with two 750MHz CPUs, 2GB of memory, 18GB drives and gigabit Ethernet is about $15,000. It's now only a matter of time before Compaq and Dell will come out with similar appliances as well. ------------------------- * Office 2000 SR-1 breaks Windows 2000 Just thought you would like to know that if a user installs Office 2000 SR-1 on a Windows 2000 machine it breaks the Search function on the machine and trashes the browser. When Microsoft was called they said they were aware but had no patches available. There is no uninstall for SR-1. Better watch it! I'll keep you up to date about fixes for this, the moment I hear. **************************************************************** 4. NT THIRD PARTY NEWS * April Product Of The Month: Security Explorer Security Explorer is a powerful and intuitive utility to search for and modify Windows NT security on NTFS drives, the Registry, and Shares. Search across subdirectories for permissions. Grant, revoke, and clone permissions across subdirectories without affecting any other user's permissions. Select 50 shares on a server, and grant permissions to multiple users and groups at one time. Export permissions to a database for further analysis and reporting. Back up your file permissions and restore them if necessary. Set ownership on files and directories. Seamless integration with the Windows NT 4.0 Desktop (right-click just about anywhere). Security Explorer makes finding security holes and fixing them a snap! Check it out at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/search_category.cfm#4 ******************************************************************** 5. HINTS AND TIPS: I was looking for a tool to remove duplicates from my Outlook address book and found this: http://www.monarchis.com/utilities/remove_dup.htm http://www.monarchis.com/utilities/dlprep.htm --------------- When you buy a laptop, or a desktop LCD screen, be careful! A friend just found out that he made a mistake ordering a 15" laptop with 1400x1050 resolution. When he decreased the resolution to 1024x768, the fonts are displayed "fuzzy". He found the explanation on the Viewsonic web page. LCD's, unlike CRTs work best in their native resolution. So when your management wants to have new LCD screens, let them show you first what resolution they want, and tell them that changing it afterward can result in very unwanted effects. Check out: http://www.monitor101.com/lcd/lcd_image.htm ******************************************************************** 6. THE NT STOCK WATCH Closing Date Friday March 31, 2000 52 WK 52 WK P/E WEEK SECURITY CLOSE HIGH LOW RATIO CHNG --------------------------------------------------------------------- Advanced Micro Devices... 57 1/16 60 14 9/16 +5.6% BMC Software............. 49 3/8 86 5/8 30 50 -6.5% BindView Development Corp 31 1/16 45 3/4 8 7/8 -17.7% Citrix Systems Inc....... 66 1/4 122 5/16 13 1/4 -32.3% Compaq Computer.......... 27 34 18 1/4 79 -5.2% Computer Associates...... 59 1/4 79 7/16 32 7/8 47 -10.9% Data Return Corporation.. 36 13/16 94 1/4 13 3/4 -45.0% Dell Computer............ 53 15/16 59 3/4 31 3/8 88 -4.4% Electronic Data Systems C 64 1/4 76 11/16 46 7/8 76 -10.9% Gateway Inc.............. 53 84 28 3/8 40 -5.7% Hewlett Packard Co....... 132 7/8 155 1/2 65 1/8 42 -6.6% Intel Corp............... 131 15/16 145 3/8 50 1/8 63 -5.1% Intergraph Corp.......... 8 7/8 10 1/4 3 3/16 +4.0% International Business Ma 118 139 3/16 81 1/2 29 -2.7% Legato Systems Inc....... 44 5/8 82 1/2 15 1/8 +19.7% Micron Electronics Inc... 14 20 11/16 9 33 -12.5% Microsoft Corp........... 106 1/4 119 15/16 75 1/2 66 -4.8% Mission Critical Software 61 1/8 77 5/8 16 -13.7% NCR Corp................. 40 1/8 54 9/16 26 11/16 12 -6.4% NetIQ Corporation........ 66 13/16 81 1/2 14 3/4 -13.2% Network Associates Inc... 32 1/4 37 3/16 10 1/16 -6.5% Novell Inc............... 28 5/8 44 9/16 16 1/16 48 -12.9% Oracle Corp.............. 78 1/16 90 10 1/2 -10.2% Qualcomm Incorporated.... 149 5/16 200 13 5/8 +2.2% Seagate Technology....... 60 1/4 76 25 1/8 15 -15.1% Silicon Graphics......... 10 9/16 18 7/8 6 7/8 -10.5% Sun Microsystems Inc..... 93 11/16 106 3/4 24 7/8 -6.5% Sybase Inc............... 20 5/16 31 6 25/64 27 -13.5% Symantec Corp............ 75 1/8 81 5/8 12 1/2 27 +2.4% Unisys Corp.............. 25 11/16 49 11/16 20 15/16 16 +1.2% Veritas Software Corp.... 131 174 13 5/8 -19.4% Dow Jones 30 Industrials. 10,921.92 -1.7% ******************************************************************** 6. "HOW TO USE THE MAILING LIST" Instructions on how to subscribe, sign off or change your email address TO SUBSCRIBE TO THE LIST (Tell your friends!) Click: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?join=nt-list and fill out the form, simple & easy: 1 minute work. Or by email, send a blank message to the following address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _____________________________________________________ TO QUIT THE LIST 1) The Web Way: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl? choose the NT-List, use your email address that is at the bottom of each newsletter and leave the list via the web interface. 2) The Email Way: Simply follow the personalized instructions at the very end of this newsletter. _____________________________________________________ TO CHANGE YOUR ADDRESS First unsubscribe and then resubscribe as per the procedure above. ******************************************************************** FOR MORE INFORMATION On the World Wide Web point your browser to: For the newsletter and our website: http://www.sunbelt-software.com For Tech Support on Sunbelt products mentioned: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/rightnow.exe Email for US sales information to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Email for US Tech support to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Email to the US Editor: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Email for European Sales to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Email for European Tech support to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] At the time of this newsletter's release, all links were checked to verify their accuracy and validity. However, due to the ever changing pages of various sites, some links may later prove to be invalid. We regret any inconvenience should you be unable to open any of these links. ******************************************************************** Things Our Lawyers Make Us Say: This document is provided for informational purposes only. The information contained in this document represents the current view of Sunbelt Software Distribution on the issues discussed as of the date of publication. Because Sunbelt must respond to changes in market conditions, it should not be interpreted to be a commitment on the part of Sunbelt and Sunbelt cannot guarantee the accuracy of any informa- tion presented after the date of publication. INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THIS DOCUMENT IS PROVIDED "AS IS" WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND FREEDOM FROM INFRINGEMENT. The user assumes the entire risk as to the accuracy and the use of this document. This document may be copied and distributed subject to the following conditions: 1) All text must be copied without modification and all pages must be included; 2) All copies must contain Sunbelt's copyright notice and any other notices provided therein; and 3) This document may not be distributed for profit. All trademarks acknowledged. Copyright Sunbelt Software Distribution, Inc. 1996-2000. [archive@jab.org] This is a posting from the nt-list, To unsubscribe, send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]