David Wooten wrote:
I'm back to ask another question:
After an initial successful installation of the purchased fonts, I've come to find that there is a serious quirk. That is, when I try to use any special glyph, be it an accented character of any kind, or e.g. an eth. The result of something like \"a (or \"{a}) is _a_ without the diacritic. Curiously (to me, at least:), if I enter the actual glyph: ä, it gives me the character I need…but only for a few runs! After adding a couple more of such "alternative" glyphs, it starts to show gibberish. Some trials evince an ff-ligature as the diacritic. Errors in the mapping/virtual font/…?
i can imagine interference between input encoding and remapping (map/enc file) later in the pipeline, but what puzzles me is that different runs produce something different; sounds more like an os/caching problem
Hans
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
| www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------_______________________________________________ ntg-context mailing list ntg-context@ntg.nl http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
