Could you please share a complete MWE. Makes it easier to test if the problem
occurs here as well.
Best,
Denis
Von: ntg-context <ntg-context-boun...@ntg.nl> Im Auftrag von Thangalin via
ntg-context
Gesendet: Montag, 6. Juni 2022 23:56
An: Bruce Horrocks <n...@scorecrow.com>
Cc: Thangalin <thanga...@gmail.com>; mailing list for ConTeXt users
<ntg-context@ntg.nl>
Betreff: Re: [NTG-context] Contractions in ligature suppression word list
Thanks for the response, Bruce.
1) The file you attached doesn't include the word "wolfing", nor "wolfin". I
assume they need to be
The suffixes section accounts for this. Wolfing and wolfish both suppress the
ligature correctly.
I removed the comma separators, good catch. No difference, though.
Looks like I edited
/opt/context/tex/texmf-context/tex/context/patterns/mkxl/lang-en.llg instead of
the LMTX file. SMH.
I've now tried both files, lmtx and mkxl:
suffixes = [[
in
in'
in’
ing
]],
Wolfish works fine, the ligature is suppressed as expected. Wolfing, wolfin,
and wolfin' aren't suppressed. I'd have thought that defining the word "wolf"
with a suffix of "ing" (and variations thereof) would suppress ligatures at the
suffix boundary?
Maybe that's not the case. If so, then it means having to define all the *f-ing
words (heh) a few times for the different suffixes (in', in’, and ing), which
seems to defeat the purpose of separating suffixes?
Help is appreciated.
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
