On Sun, Apr 16, 2023 at 01:24:08PM -0300, Jim via ntg-context wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 16, 2023 at 08:28 (-0400), Carlos via ntg-context wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Apr 15, 2023 at 02:27:56PM -0300, Jim via ntg-context wrote:
> >> In the wiki page https://wiki.contextgarden.net/Indentation there is the
> >> following example:
>
> >> %------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> >> \setupindenting[medium,yes]
> >> \setupitemize[indentnext=auto]
>
> >> \startitemize
> >> \item One
> >> \stopitemize
>
> >> This paragraph should be indented - due to the blank line after
> >> \type{\stopitemize}.
>
> >> \startitemize
> >> \item Two
> >> \stopitemize
> >> This paragraph should not be indented.
>
> >> %------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> >> Tragically, the paragraph which claims it should be indented is not, in
> >> both my test and the wiki page itself.
>
> >> Is this a documentation bug, a ConTeXt bug, or something else yet?
>
> > I don't know.
>
> OK, but I wasn't asking you specifically.
Thnt's more than obvious, asshole. Or passive-aggressive asshole.
You're posting it on the mailing list for the users, devs, and
end-users alike to test it out as required and comment or say whatever
they want.
>
> > Why would it be a documentation bug if it clearly says it should be
> > indented only after the blank line, unless \indent was omitted on purpose
> > while trying to make it look as if the blank line would have any effect
> > after all. Makes no sense.
>
> Have you never run into a documentation bug before? Happy you!
>
> I see two possibly reasons for a documentation bug here (there might be more):
> (1) The documentation was incorrect at time of writing. Humans have been
> known to make mistakes.
> (2) The semantics of \setupitemize might have changed since the documentation
> was written, and the change has not yet been reflected in this
> particular piece of documentation.
> This would not be the first time that documentation changes lagged
> behind code changes.
>
Neither one.
> The point is, there is a disconnect between the documentation says will
> happen and what actually happens. I don't know which is wrong, and thus my
> question. I hope that sooner or later someone who can definitively comment
> on the disconnect will speak up.
I agree. :)
>
> > \setupindenting[medium,yes]
> > \setupitemize[indentnext=auto]
>
> > \starttext
> > \startitemize
> > \item One
> > \stopitemize\indent%blank line
>
> > This paragraph should be indented - due to the blank line after
> > \type{\stopitemize}.
>
> > \startitemize
> > \item Two
> > \stopitemize
>
> > \noindent{\dorecurse{10}{\indent This paragraph should not be indented.}}
> > \stoptext
> ___________________________________________________________________________________
> If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
> Wiki!
>
> maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl /
> https://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
> webpage : https://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
> archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
> wiki : https://contextgarden.net
> ___________________________________________________________________________________
>
--
To err is human -- to blame it on a computer is even more so.
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / https://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : https://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : https://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
