Hi,
On Sun, Aug 13, 2023 at 9:13 AM Xavier B. <somenxav...@posteo.net> wrote:
>
> So,
>
> Finally is it a bug in MKIV? It seems you fix some kind of bug in your
> messages. Is it true?
>
> > The output with Luametatex is correct but Luatex creates a raised bar
> > (and different linebreaking).
> >
> > \showglyphs
> >
> > \startTEXpage[offset=1ex]
> > \ruledhbox{$\overline {OA} = \overbar {OA} = 4.2$}
> > \par
> > \ruledhbox{$\underline {OA} = \underbar {OA} = 4.2$}
> > \par
> > \ruledhbox{$\widetilde {OA} = \widebar {OA} = 4.2$}
> > \par
> > \ruledhbox{$\overbracket {OA} = \underbracket {OA} = 4.2$}
> > \stopTEXpage
> >
> > I'll add a 'force fix in spite of extensible being present' in mkiv. In
> > lmtx we always fix also because we drop in nicer shapes (watch the round
> > tips in lm and fancy tips in antykwa) and concluded that fonts will
> > remain as they are.
> >
> > Hans
>
> As you suggested, I will give a try to LMTX but be aware most user still use
> MKIV until most distros upgrade the texlive version of context to LMTX.
>
> Regards,
> Xavier
One can also try to instead use the accent mechanism instead of a stacker:
% engine=luatex
\definemathtopaccent[widebar] ["0305]
\startTEXpage[offset=3pt]
$\overbar{OA}$
$\widebar{OA}$
\stopTEXpage
The \widebar is defined (almost) like that in lmtx.
/Mikael
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / https://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : https://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : https://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
