On 8/22/2023 9:06 AM, denis.ma...@unibe.ch wrote:
But, I think the way this is processed differs a bit from XSLT. In XSLT the
most specific match will be applied, but ConTeXt seems to proceed from top to
bottom until it finds a match. (Is that correct?)
it just associates the most recent match with a setup . if needed we
could extend the mechanism with varianst but i have to admit that it has
been stable (mostly untouched) for close to 15 years now so all has to
be done very careful; it has also be tuned for performance and large
scale throughput
Hans
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.nl | www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / https://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : https://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : https://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
