Tobias Burnus wrote:
Hi,
Hans Hagen wrote:
chinese is not yet defined in utf so if you want that, we need to do it
We probably should.
question: do the unicode tables cover gbk and big 5 well?
There exists a one-to-one correspondence between GBK and Unicode [1],
for Big5 there are 7 characters which cannot be mapped one-to-one (see
comment at top of [2]); thee of which appear twice in Big5 but only
once in Unicode, two are not in unicode and there are two mapping
problems.
In practive one can thus say: Both GBK and Big5 can be mapped to Unicode.
so, if we can make things utf deep down and remap gbk and big 5 to utf,
we can do with one set of fonts, metrics etc
i got chinese working in utf now, but need an enco table for teh special
cases (see enco-chi); when someone made me that table, i can upload an
alpha
Hans
_______________________________________________
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
