David Munger wrote:
> Very interesting, but with these definitions, I can't get roman
> characters in formulae. For the moment, the best solution for me is
> still the hbox wrapper.
Okay.
What do you mean by "can't get roman characters"? Can you give an
minimal example?
adam
>> Adam Lindsay wrote:
>>
>>> \startmathcollection[default] %eventual patch for math-tex?
>>> \definemathcharacter [a] [nothing] [mi] ["61]
>>> \definemathcharacter [b] [nothing] [mi] ["62]
>>> \definemathcharacter [c] [nothing] [mi] ["63]
>>> \definemathcharacter [d] [nothing] [mi] ["64]
>>> \definemathcharacter [e] [nothing] [mi] ["65]
>> ...
>>
>> Interesting. With these definitions in place, getting mixed bold in cmr
>> math is a lot better, too...
>>
>> \definetypeface [] [mm] [bfmath] [computer-modern] [computer-modern]
>> \setupformulas [method=bold]
>>
>> \starttext
>> \startformula
>> n({\bfm a} + {\bfm b}) = {\bfm \Gamma}
>> \stopformula
>> \stoptext
>>
>> Now, do digits ever get bold-ed in mixed bold and regular math?
>
> _______________________________________________
> ntg-context mailing list
> ntg-context@ntg.nl
> http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Adam T. Lindsay, Computing Dept. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lancaster University, InfoLab21 +44(0)1524/510.514
Lancaster, LA1 4WA, UK Fax:+44(0)1524/510.492
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
_______________________________________________
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
