Hello Hans, The sections in Slovenian have to be numbered wih dots at the end:
1. Introduction 2. Contents 2.1. Subsection 2.1.1. Subsubsection 2.1.2. Subsubsection 2.2. Subsection 2.3. Subsection 3. Bibliography rather than 1 Introduction 2 Contents 2.1 Subsection 2.1.1 Subsubsection 2.1.2 Subsubsection 2.2 Subsection 2.3 Subsection 3 Bibliography There are many commands in ConTeXt which support "delimiter" key, but here the delimiter already stands for the dot delimiting subsequent numbers in this case. There's a possible solution listed on http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Dotted_number_in_caption, ie: \def\Dot#1{#1.} \setuphead[section][numbercommand=\Dot] \setuplist[section][numbercommand=\Dot] \setuplist[subsection][numbercommand=\Dot] \setuplist[subsubsection][numbercommand=\Dot] but this cannot be built into "languagespecifics" as such since it interferes with user-defined "numbercommands" (if the user defines his own numbercommand, the dot would disapear). This is low-priority (can be circumvented and done properly if needed), but I would be very glad if an additional keyword & its setting could make its way into "languagespecifics" once in the future if possible. LaTeX people did that (not aplicable to ConTeXt at all): \renewcommand\thepart [EMAIL PROTECTED]@part} \renewcommand\thesection [EMAIL PROTECTED]@section.} \renewcommand\thesubsection [EMAIL PROTECTED]@subsection} [EMAIL PROTECTED]@subsubsection} \renewcommand\theparagraph [EMAIL PROTECTED]@paragraph} \renewcommand\thesubparagraph [EMAIL PROTECTED]@subparagraph} \renewcommand\appendix{\par \setcounter{section}{0}% \setcounter{subsection}{0}% [EMAIL PROTECTED]@section.}} Also, Part 1 may be written as "1. poglavje" (with dot) or "Poglavje 1" (without dot), so there has to remain an option to remove a dot only for a certain title if necessary. The only online reference I know (list of mistakes in babel) is written in Slovenian http://nl.ijs.si/gnusl/tex/tslovene/slolang/node98.html-l2#SECTION0002031400000000000000 but I guess that the content can at least partially be evident from the TeX sources. Once again the same comment as the last time with itemizing. If this will ever be implemented and added, it will change the behaviour (and break the old behaviour in a way), but I guess that there are not so many people typesetting Slovenian in ConTeXt yet. There will be less harm if a few old documents are fixed than if tons of other newer documents are typeset wrong. Thanks a lot, Mojca _______________________________________________ ntg-context mailing list ntg-context@ntg.nl http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
