nico wrote: > On Thu, 20 Apr 2006 17:27:50 -0700, Johannes Graumann > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> nico wrote: >> >>> Why don't you test if the attribute is set before applying it to the TR? >>> You see the problem on the last row, but the fact is that you force the >>> bottomframe clear for every row (which is dirty IMHO). >> It's not that easy, since the bottomframe - once set - is persistent ... >> so >> every row underneath my header (e.g.) will have 'bottomframe=on' set. > > No, the options are local to the current level where it is set. If > bottomframe is on for one row, it won't set bottomframe to the next rows. > In the following example, only two rows (the header and another one in the > body) have local bottomframe on, and the last row bottomframe is done with > table setup:
The persistence issue is XML specific, I believe and therefore does not apply to your code example. Joh _______________________________________________ ntg-context mailing list ntg-context@ntg.nl http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
