frantisek holop wrote:
> hmm, on Fri, May 05, 2006 at 12:03:15AM +0200, Hans Hagen said that
>
>> I'd like to make the ruby version of texexec the default. Are there any
>> strong objections to this?
>>
>> Also, i'd like the stubs to run texmfstart as launcher. For that
>> purpose i'll add a /scripts/context/stubs/[mswin|unix] path with the
>> default stubs that one can copy to some bin path
>>
>
>
> just out of curiosity, is there a particular reason why ruby was chosen?
> was something wrong with perl? will the next one (newnewtexexec) be in
> python? :)))
>
it's all a matter of taste. i like ruby and after working with it for a whiel
decided that i could write better / cleaner code in ruby than in perl; i
skipped python (didn't like some of its syntax); i'll stick to ruby (and later
on lua for embedded tex stuff, but that's another story); so, there wil not be
a texexec.py
Hans
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
| www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
