On Mon, 22 Jan 2007, luigi scarso wrote: > On 1/22/07, Peter Rolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Claudia Lanzl wrote: >>> Hi Peter, hi Luigi, >>> >>> didn´t think of tables and I don´t know much about it, >>> but maybe a combination of your ideas? >>> Two tables (the first for picture 1, 2 and 3) and a second one >>> for picture 4 and 5? >>> >> >> i don't think that using two tables brings you any advantage (especially >> the second one would be only overhead). instead you can use a table with >> tree columns (is this what you ment, luigi?) > ~Yes. > The first time i saw it i thought something like this > width(pic02) = 2*U > width(pic03) = 2*U > width(pic05) = 3*U > width(pic04) = 3*U > width(pic01) = 4*U > plus some rows for labels and maybe some 0.2*U for columns for separations. > >> http://wiki.contextgarden.net/TABLE#Designing_complex_TABLEs > and core-ntb.tex > or texmfstart texexec --pdf --modu core-ntb
Actually texmfstart texexec --module kpse:core-ntb.tex which will work from any directory. Aditya _______________________________________________ ntg-context mailing list ntg-context@ntg.nl http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
