hmm, on Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 09:02:34PM +0200, Mojca Miklavec said that > \setupitemize[1][n] > \setupitemize[2][a][left=(,right=),stopper=] > \setupitemize[3][i] > \setupitemize[4][1] % symbol nr. 1
ok, i would like to create 2 types of itemizations like in latex. \begin{enumarate} vs \begin{itemize} (or in html <ol> vs <ul>) \begin{itemize} is basically \startitemize how would i go about defining \startenumarate ? i thought of something like this, but it's not working: \startsetups enum \setupitemize[1][n] \setupitemize[2][a][left=(,right=),stopper=] \setupitemize[3][i] \setupitemize[4][1] % symbol nr. 1 \stopsetups \definestartstop[enum][command=\setups{enum}] \starttext \startenum \item test \stopenum \stoptext 1. it doesnt work if there's no blank line between \item and \stopenum i seem to recall something about a needed \par because of internal workings. 2. it doesnt work, the setupitemize's are either not picked up or are being overrided. -f -- funny how life imitates lsd. ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________