On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 3:43 AM, Thomas A. Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Apr 22, 2008, at 11:57 PM, zs wrote: > > > I recommend you to use "evince" viewer. I suppose, its output is > > even nicer than acroread's one. > > C-R reloads are supported. > > > > ZS > > While I like and use evince on linux, I must also say that it's still > not a very good viewer. Just to give you an example:
When talking about evince, it is important to check which rendering libraries are used. I have documents that render correctly on my debian box with at least one of the available evince packages (linked to poppler 0.6.4), but not on Red Hat Fedora 8 (linked to poppler-0.6.2), where some fonts are shown with "?". While writing documents, I tend to use either apparition, which is fast (as long as it is running on the local machine -- it can be very slow over a network), or Emacs DocView just makes a png image of each page -- often enough to make sure some TeX fragment is working properly. -- George N. White III <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Head of St. Margarets Bay, Nova Scotia ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
