On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 2:57 PM, Yue Wang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 5/31/08, luigi scarso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > Last night I remembered two more things that TeX can't do, but every >> > layout app can: >> > - text flow around other elements (images) >> \parshape ? >> > > I forword an email to the professor. > it discuss some of the points together with some examples. > > \parshape is not enough for arbitary page layout. \parshape can help for text flow around other elements, hence for layout of a page. What do you mean with "\parshape is not enough for arbitary page layout" ? There are other macros/ tools for page layout as otr for example.
> >> > - really working multiple-column layout >> in context columnset with two pass strategy >> > > columnset cannot solve most of the problems:) Do you have some examples ? > > if you want advanced page layout justification, TeX is not sufficient. > What do you mean with advanced ? Do you have som examples ? -- luigi ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
